Find Lambda_2 for Double Slit Interference Pattern

AI Thread Summary
To find the wavelength (lambda_2) of the second laser that aligns its second maximum with the fourth minimum of the first laser in a double slit interference pattern, the equations dsin(theta) = 2(lambda_1) and dsin(theta) = (9/2)(lambda_2) are used. Setting these equations equal leads to the expression lambda_2 = (2/9)d, but the solution must not depend on theta. The confusion arises from the multiplicative factor in the final answer. The correct approach involves ensuring the relationship between the maxima and minima is accurately represented in terms of the slit separation d. The solution ultimately requires careful consideration of the interference conditions.
yo_man
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A laser with wavelength d/8 is shining light on a double slit with slit separation d. This results in an interference pattern on a screen a distance L away from the slits. We wish to shine a second laser, with a different wavelength, through the same slits.
What is the wavelength (lambda_2) of the second laser that would place its second maximum at the same location as the fourth minimum of the first laser?
Express your answer in terms of d

Homework Equations


I have (dsin(theta)) = 2(lambda_1)
and dsin(theta)= (9/2)(lambda_2)


The Attempt at a Solution



I set the two equations equal to each other, and solve for lambda_2 and get (2/9)dsin(theta), but then it said the answer does not depend on theta.. so I just guessed and put (2/9)d and it said I was off by a multiplicative factor. basically, I'm confused and do not know how to go about solving this problem. please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have (dsin(theta)) = 2(lambda_1)
and dsin(theta)= (9/2)(lambda_2)
Check this.
Second maximum of second laser and fourth minimum of the first laser
 
is it

(2(lambda_2)L)/d = ((4+.5)(d/8)L)/d
 
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top