Find minimum energy of a photon to produce 25keV electron in compton scatter?

j2dabizo
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the minimum energy that photons must have to produce 25 keV electrons in a Compton scattering? (answer in keV)

Homework Equations



Not too sure here, We know Eincident= Efinal + K.E.electron

We know that the work function (binding energy) is also taken into account but most of the time it is in eV, so we can (i think) omit that here.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure once again. How can we find the minimum incident energy of a photon without any other info but the 25 K.E. of the electron.

My logic tells me that, why can't it be 26 keV, Efinal = 1kev and KE of electron = 25 kev.

Help please Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start off, take a look at the Compton scattering formula: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scattering#Description_of_the_phenomenon

To give electron as much energy as possible, you want the photon to lose as much energy as possible. What's the maximum possible change in the photon's wavelength?

Once you get that, use the conservation of energy to relate the electron's final energy (25 keV) to the photon's initial and final wavelengths. You now have 2 equations with 2 unknowns, and can solve for the photon's initial energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top