Find n of a mass confined between 2 rigid walls?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iafatel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the quantum number n for a mass confined between two rigid walls. A mass of 1 mg moving at 3 cm/s is analyzed using the equations for energy and momentum. Initial calculations yield a value of n around 9.1 x 10^18, which is deemed excessively large. A simpler approach using the CGS system leads to a recalculated n of approximately 9 x 10^23, indicating that the particle behaves classically within the box. This scenario exemplifies the Correspondence Principle, where high quantum numbers result in quantum mechanics aligning with classical mechanics.
iafatel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small object of mass 1mg is confined to move between two rigid walls separated by 1cm, if the speed of the object is 3cm/s find the corresponding value of n

Homework Equations



P=\sqrt{2mE}
E = \frac{h^{2}}{8mL^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


V = 3cm/s = .03m/s
m = 1mg = 1x10^{-6}kg

P = mv
mv=\sqrt{2mE}
(mv)^{2} = 2mE
E=\frac{(mv)^{2}}{2m} = \frac{[(.03)(1x10^{-6})]^{2}}{2} = 4.5x10^{-16}J

E = \frac{h^{2}}{8mL^{2}}

n = \sqrt{\frac{8EmL^{2}}{h^{2}}}

= \sqrt{\frac{(8)(4.5x10^{-16})(.01)(1x10^{-6})^{2}}{(6.626x10^{-34})^{2}}}

I get...9.1x10^{18}

seems rather large...any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
iafatel said:
I get...9.1x10^{18}

seems rather large...any ideas?

First of all, your calculation is probably not correct. (But you check it once more.)

Since n is dimensionless, it can be evaluated in any consistent system of units. There’s no need to introduce the momentum p etc. and make the thing unnecessarily lengthy and messy.

Using the CGS system, where h=6.63*10^-27 erg-sec, and writing E = ½ mv^2,

n = \sqrt{8EmL^2/h^2}<br /> = \sqrt{{8(1/2)mv^2*L^2}/{h^2}}<br /> = 2mvL/h (becomes so simple!)

= 2*10^{-3}*3*1/(6.63*10^{-27}) <br /> = 9*10^{23}. (Please check once.)

But this n is also high, meaning that the particle behaves like a classical particle within the box, spending more or less equal times in all parts of the box, because there is a very large number of half waves between the two walls.

If n was 1, say, there would be only one half wave, which would mean that the particle would be spending more time near the middle of the box, since the amplitude of the standing wave and thus it’s square is higher near the middle, and so the probability of finding it near the middle is higher than at other points.

This is an example of the Correspondence Principle, which states that at high quantum numbers, quantum mechanical results tend to reduce to classical mechanical ones.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top