MHB Find Solution to Power & Resistance w/ 10 Ohm Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Resistance
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a 10 ohm resistance capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W using 10 ohm resistors rated for 1.0 W, a configuration of 9 resistors arranged in a 3x3 grid is necessary. This setup allows for parallel connections that reduce resistance while maintaining the total at 10 ohms through series connections. Each resistor in this configuration can handle the power without exceeding its limit. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how resistors behave in series and parallel to avoid damage. Properly combining these equations is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
dstorm
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Here is the question: You are given a number of 10 ohm resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.0 W without being destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or in parallel to make a 10 ohm resistance that is capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W?

When I attempted to do this problem, I had thought that power added in parallel, so I assumed that it would take 5 resistors. However, after checking to see if I was correct in the back of the book, I realized that I was doing something wrong. So now I'm left with the rules of resistance in parallel, being Rp(total) = Sum(Rp(i)) and the rule of resistance in series, being 1/(Rs(total)) = Sum(1/(Rs(i))). However, from here, I'm not sure how to manipulate these equations. How would I go about this problem? I'm sorry that I'm not very far along on it. It just stumped me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dstorm said:
Here is the question: You are given a number of 10 ohm resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.0 W without being destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or in parallel to make a 10 ohm resistance that is capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W?

When I attempted to do this problem, I had thought that power added in parallel, so I assumed that it would take 5 resistors. However, after checking to see if I was correct in the back of the book, I realized that I was doing something wrong. So now I'm left with the rules of resistance in parallel, being Rp(total) = Sum(Rp(i)) and the rule of resistance in series, being 1/(Rs(total)) = Sum(1/(Rs(i))). However, from here, I'm not sure how to manipulate these equations. How would I go about this problem? I'm sorry that I'm not very far along on it. It just stumped me.

Hi dstorm! Welcome to MHB! :)

If you put 2 resistors in series, the total resistance doubles.
And if you put 2 resistors in parallel, the total resistance is halved.

So suppose we put 2 in series and put them parallel to another 2 in series.
Then we will still have 10 Ohm as the total resistance.
What will the power dissipation in each resistor be?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi dstorm! Welcome to MHB! :)

If you put 2 resistors in series, the total resistance doubles.
And if you put 2 resistors in parallel, the total resistance is halved.

So suppose we put 2 in series and put them parallel to another 2 in series.
Then we will still have 10 Ohm as the total resistance.
What will the power dissipation in each resistor be?

Thanks! So the total power would be 4 W, because each can produce 1 W of power, right? So in order to get at least 5 W of power, we would need 9 resistors in a 3x3 form because the parallel ones would divide the resistance by 3 and the series ones would triple the resistance, thus equalizing it back to 10 ohms. So you can kinda combine the equations?
 
dstorm said:
Thanks! So the total power would be 4 W, because each can produce 1 W of power, right? So in order to get at least 5 W of power, we would need 9 resistors in a 3x3 form because the parallel ones would divide the resistance by 3 and the series ones would triple the resistance, thus equalizing it back to 10 ohms. So you can kinda combine the equations?

Yeah.
Theoretically a more convoluted circuit could be set up.
But then you get fractions that simply won't come out as 10 Ohm any more.
And anyway, the current has to be distributed evenly to avoid resistors from blowing up.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top