Find Tension at Shaft C & D: 2500N & 5kN

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shaft Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating tension at points C and D on a shaft, specifically addressing the use of reaction forces versus applied loads. The correct approach involves using the reaction forces from the bearings to determine stress, as the 5 kN load alone does not induce stress without a reaction. It is clarified that while the 5 kN force can be included in calculations, it is not the sole contributor to the moment at point C. The location of point C is critical, as it is at the transition from a 50 mm to a 60 mm diameter, where stress is zero at the corner. The stress distribution at this transition is complex and best analyzed through Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
I've got this shaft you can see in my drawing below, and I'm supposed to find the tension at the locations C and D. At point C I use the following equation:

\sigma=\frac{M}{W}=\frac{2500\cdot350}{\frac{50^3\cdot\pi}{32}}=71,3 N/mm^2

This is apparently the right thing to do. 2500 comes from the reaction forces from the bearings at the ends. What I don't really see is why can't I use the force of 5 kN to calculate this. Putting in 5000*150 instead and exchanging 50 for 60 in the denominator. Could someone explain this to me...?
 

Attachments

  • shaft.jpg
    shaft.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 683
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you are referring to the normal stresses due to bending, then it looks like you are using the section modulus in the denominator which is right. The reason you can not do what you are thinking is becasue a force has to be created by a reaction to create the stress. The 5kN load on it's own will do nothing to induce the stress. It is the reactions that create the stress. If you have done beam deflections, you always start at one end where you know the reaction and calculated the moment and shear diagrams moving from end to end. The same thing applys here.
 
What I don't really see is why can't I use the force of 5 kN to calculate this. Putting in 5000*150 instead ...
Just to clarify what Fred is saying, actually you CAN put the 5000*150 in, but that's not the ONLY moment if you take moments around point C to the right of point C. You also have the 2500 N load at a distance of 650. The total moment then at point C, if you take moments created on the right side, is:
-5000*150+2500*650 which is the same as 2500*350.

... and exchanging 50 for 60 in the denominator. Could someone explain this to me...?
The location of point C is implied. It is implied that it is at the corner where the shaft is at 50 mm and about to step up to 60 mm. There is NO stress at the corner where it is at 60 mm, there is nothing at that corner to react against. If the diagram was a bit more specific, it would have shown point C with an arrow pointing at the inside corner at the 50 mm diameter.

The stress on the OD of the shaft where it steps up to a larger diameter is zero at the step and will gradually increase to the value calculated as you show here. There is no easy way of calculating that stress distribution by hand, though you would see it if you performed an FEA analysis.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top