Find the acceleration due to gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration due to gravity using a pendulum with a length of 3.6 meters, where the period was measured to be 3.167 seconds. The calculated value of gravity was found to be approximately 14.156 m/s², which contradicts the book's answer of 9.4 m/s². Participants suggest that the discrepancy may stem from an error in the book or a misunderstanding of the term "shakes." The consensus is that the original calculation method appears correct, and the problem likely pertains to the definition of the pendulum used. Ultimately, the calculated result is supported over the book's answer.
zade70
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person shakes pendulum with length 3.6 meters. For 12 shakes he measured the time of 38 seconds. Find the acceleration due to gravity

Homework Equations


T=t/n
T=2*pi*sqrt(l/g)

The Attempt at a Solution


T(period)=t/n=3.167
T=2*pi*sqrt(l/g) l-length
g=4*(pi)^2*l/T^2
g=14.156
The solution in my book is 9.4 m/s^2. Where is my error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution method looks fine.

Perhaps there's an error in the book (Sometimes they update problems with new editions but fail to update the answer key), or there's something about the definition of "shakes" that we're missing. Is the problem statement a translation?
 
gneill said:
Your solution method looks fine.

Perhaps there's an error in the book (Sometimes they update problems with new editions but fail to update the answer key), or there's something about the definition of "shakes" that we're missing. Is the problem statement a translation?
Yes
 
What is the original language? Is there more information in the original problem statement that you haven't shown?
 
gneill said:
What is the original language? Is there more information in the original problem statement that you haven't shown?
I have given all the information. The correct answer is 9.4 m/S^2
 
Your answer is correct (if you round to the correct number of significant figures). I don't agree with the book's answer.
 
  • Like
Likes zade70
Was the pendulum a simple pendulum (mass bob on a string) or something else, like a solid rod?
 
zade70 said:
When we do similar problems we consider the pendulum like this http://dev.physicslab.org/img/14c7c356-6f6e-49e4-a953-2396343435fb.gif. The problem just says a pendulum is vibrated.
Okay, so simple pendulum it is:
upload_2016-3-23_13-12-2.png


Then again, I support your result and not the book's.
 
  • Like
Likes zade70
  • #10
Saloni Khanna said:
Saloni Khanna, post: 5419032, member: 588906"]
gneill said:
Okay, so simple pendulum it is:
View attachment 97843

Then again, I support your result and not the book's.
gneill, did you use paint to draw that picture or what program did you use, i really want to know . Sorry for saying something not related to OP
 
  • #11
The Vinh said:
gneill, did you use paint to draw that picture or what program did you use, i really want to know . Sorry for saying something not related to OP
The picture came from the OP's link. I just cut-and-pasted it to make it visible in-thread; off-site links have a tendency to disappear over time.

I do make quite a few images for posting here though. I use an old version of Visio to make them.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
The picture came from the OP's link. I just cut-and-pasted it to make it visible in-thread; off-site links have a tendency to disappear over time.

I do make quite a few images for posting here though. I use an old version of Visio to make them.
many thanks to you
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top