Find the angular acceleration of a hinged beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a hinged beam, with the correct answer being 41.4 rad/s². The user struggles with understanding the application of torque equations and the moment of inertia for the beam. Key points of confusion include the location of the center of gravity and whether to include the mass of an attached box. Participants suggest developing free body equations for both the beam and the mass separately, emphasizing the need to consider the relationship between their accelerations. A recommendation is made to work symbolically before substituting numerical values to avoid errors.
UselessLadder
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have the following problem that I'm lost on.
problem_zpsc81959fc.jpg


The answer is 41.4 rad/s2 but I don't understand how to arrive at it.

Homework Equations


ƩT=I(alpha)
I=1/3 ML2 for a rod with axis through one end.

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved the above equations to get (alpha)=T/I, but no matter what I try from here I get small numbers under 5.
I'm confused on a couple points: is the center of gravity in the middle of the rod or the tip? Should I add the mass of the box (since the cable is cut, not the rope)? And I'm really confused as to how to write the sum of torques.
I tried following this example, with and without the box, but it I'm getting small numbers not even close to 41. Could someone please explain clearly to go about solving this? Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pls post your working.
 
I converted the masses to Newtons to get 833N for the beam and 4214N for the box. Then I used trig to get the length of the beam (3m) and the angles: 37degrees below the beam and 53 above. Then I tried this, based on an example from my class notes (assuming the center of the beam's gravity is in the middle):
untitled_zps9b5acb68.jpg
,
substituting 5047N for m and 3 for L, then solving for alpha. But that's clearly wrong.
Then I tried following this example exactly as shown, with units as shown, but I got 4.4(without the box) and 3.9 (with the box's weight added). Not even close to 41.
 
Last edited:
You're overlooking that the mass will accelerate too. Let the tension in the rope be T. Develop the free body equations for the beam and the mass separately. The relationship between the beam's angular acceleration and the mass's vertical acceleration will need a bit of care.
I recommend doing all working symbolically, only plugging in numbers as the final step. That goes for the angles too. It makes it much easier to follow the reasoning and to spot mistakes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top