Find the charge distribution pattern.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the electric field generated by a specific distribution of point charges: -e and +e separated by a distance d, followed by a configuration of -e, 2e, and +e also spaced d apart. The challenge lies in understanding how to set up the third charge distribution based on the given pattern, particularly after altering the charge signs and adjusting their positions. The relevant equation for calculating the electric field is E=q(1)q(2)/d^2. Participants express confusion regarding the instructions for establishing the charge distribution pattern. Clarification on these steps is necessary to proceed with solving the problem effectively.
Aesteus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1st terms = -e and positive e separated by d.
2nd terms = Two units of charge e form a system of 3 point charges -e, 2e, and e (all d apart).

The next terms are formed by changing the sign of the charge and then moving by one unit length.

Homework Equations



E=q(1)q(2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The actual problem is finding the E-field of the distribution of charges. However, I can't get past the wording of how it's telling me to set up the 3rd charge distribution. What exactly is the pattern here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aesteus said:

Homework Statement





1st terms = -e and positive e separated by d.
2nd terms = Two units of charge e form a system of 3 point charges -e, 2e, and e (all d apart).

The next terms are formed by changing the sign of the charge and then moving by one unit length.

Homework Equations



E=q(1)q(2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The actual problem is finding the E-field of the distribution of charges. However, I can't get past the wording of how it's telling me to set up the 3rd charge distribution. What exactly is the pattern here?
Please give the complete problem, word for word.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top