Find the currents in the circuit branches

  • Thread starter Thread starter endeavor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Currents
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the currents in a circuit with given voltages and resistances using Kirchhoff's rules. Initial attempts resulted in a negative current value, indicating a potential error in loop direction. Participants suggest simplifying the circuit by combining resistors in parallel before assigning loops, which reduces complexity. After applying this simplification, the problem becomes more manageable with fewer loops to analyze. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of simplification in circuit analysis for clearer results.
endeavor
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
http://img335.imageshack.us/img335/8383/physics4a8ua.th.png http://img335.imageshack.us/img335/8000/physics4b6vo.th.png
"Find the currents in the circuit branches in [the first figure on the left above]."

V1 = 20V, V2 = 10V, R1 = 5.0 ohms, R2 = 4.0 ohms, R3 = 6.0 ohms, R4=R5=R6= 2.0 ohms

Rp-1 = 3/2 (from R4,R5,R6)
Rp = 2/3 ohms

I assigned loops in the second figure above. There are 6 different currents.
Using Kirchhoff's first rule:
(C1) I1 = I2 + I3
(C2) I3 = I4 + I5
(C3) I1 = 3I6
Then using the Kirchhoff's second rule, I get a bunch of equations (L1 = LOOP 1):
(L1) -V1 +I2R1 + I1Rp = 0
(L2) +V2 +I5R2 - I2R1 = 0
(L3) +I4R3 - I5R2 = 0
(L7) -V1 + V2 +I5R2 +I1Rp = 0
(L8) +V2 - I2R1 +I4R3 = 0
(L9) -V1 +I1Rp +I4R3 + V2 = 0
Then substituting values for the V's and R's:
(L1) 5*I2 + (2/3)*I1 = 20
(L2) 4*I5 - 5*I2 = -10
(L3) 6*I4 - 4*I5 = 0
(L7) 4*I5 + (2/3)*I1 = 10
(L8) -5*I2 + 6*I4 = -10
(L9) (2/3)*I1 + 6*I4 = 10
I then found that I3 = (5/2)*I4. Then using this equation, and equations C1 and L9, I finally got:
I1 = - 90/462 A = -0.19 A

I think the fact that my answer is negative only shows that I chose the wrong loop direction. But the absolute value of my answer is still wrong... help :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should simplify a bit more before assigning loops ... R2 || R3.
Then you have a loop on the left and a loop on the right.

- I_L R_P - (I_L - I_R) R_1 - V_1 = 0 ... because I_1(upward) = I_L - I_R
- I_R R_{2||3} + V_2 - (I_R - I_L) R_1 = 0 .
 
thanks! Simplifying really worked. After I simplified the parallel parts, I only had 3 loops, which was a lot easier to work with.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top