Find the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian - Harmonic Oscillator

Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvalues of the following Hamiltonian.

Ĥ = ħwâ^{†}â + \alpha(â + â^{†}) , \alpha \in |R

Homework Equations



â|\phi_{n}>=\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n-1}>
â^{†}|\phi_{n}>=\sqrt{n+1}|\phi_{n+1}>

The Attempt at a Solution



By applying the Hamiltonian to a random state n I get:

Ĥ |\phi_{n}> = E_{n}|\phi_{n}>
Ĥ |\phi_{n}>= ħwâ^{†}â|\phi_{n}> + \alpha(â|\phi_{n}> + â^{†}|\phi_{n}>)
Ĥ |\phi_{n}>= ħw\sqrt{n}\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n}> + \alpha(\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n-1}> + \sqrt{n+1}|\phi_{n+1}> )
E_{n} |\phi_{n}> = ħwn + \alpha(\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n-1}> + \sqrt{n+1}|\phi_{n+1}>)

This is where my problem arrives. I don't know how to prove that

\alpha(\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n-1}> + \sqrt{n+1}|\phi_{n+1}>) = 0

Any help would be highly appreciated!
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jalo said:
This is where my problem arrives. I don't know how to prove that

\alpha(\sqrt{n}|\phi_{n-1}> + \sqrt{n+1}|\phi_{n+1}>) = 0

Any help would be highly appreciated!
Thanks.

That linear combination doesn't vanish and the states ##|n\rangle## are not eigenstates of that Hamiltonian. The eigenstates will be infinite linear combinations of the ##| n \rangle##. However, constructing these eigenstates is certainly not the easiest way to compute the eigenvalues of this operator. I would suggest defining a new operator ## b = a + c##, where ##c## is a number to be determined by requiring that ##\hat{H} = \hbar \omega b^\dagger b + C ##, where ##C## is another constant. Using the commutation relations for ##b,b^\dagger##, you should be able to compute the eigenvalues in the same way as for the regular harmonic oscillator.
 
fzero said:
That linear combination doesn't vanish and the states ##|n\rangle## are not eigenstates of that Hamiltonian. The eigenstates will be infinite linear combinations of the ##| n \rangle##. However, constructing these eigenstates is certainly not the easiest way to compute the eigenvalues of this operator. I would suggest defining a new operator ## b = a + c##, where ##c## is a number to be determined by requiring that ##\hat{H} = \hbar \omega b^\dagger b + C ##, where ##C## is another constant. Using the commutation relations for ##b,b^\dagger##, you should be able to compute the eigenvalues in the same way as for the regular harmonic oscillator.

And how can I find the operator b?
 
Jalo said:
And how can I find the operator b?

You solve the equation

$$\hbar \omega (a+c)^\dagger (a+c) + C = \hbar \omega a^\dagger a + \alpha (a + a^\dagger)$$

for ##c## and ##C##. This is a linear equation, since the ##a^\dagger a## terms cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I just realized I forgot to thank you! Accept my apologies.

Daniel
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top