Find the final speed of an electron

AI Thread Summary
The final speed of an electron starting from rest and passing between two parallel plates with a potential difference of 5000V is calculated to be 4.2*10^7 m/s using the formula v=sqrt(2qV/m). While this calculation is valid under classical physics, it becomes problematic at higher potential differences, such as 30,000V, where relativistic effects must be considered. The mass of the electron increases as it approaches the speed of light, which is not accounted for in the basic calculation. However, for typical schoolwork scenarios, the initial calculation remains acceptable. Overall, the answer is valid within the context of classical physics for the given parameters.
marshall4
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Find the final speed of an electron, starting from rest, passing between two parallel plates with a potential difference of 5000V.

m=9.1*10^-31kg
q=1.6*10^-19C

v=sqr root of [2(1.6*10^-19)(5000)]/9.1*10^-31 = 4.2*10^7 m/s

Is this answer valid, why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and No

The calculation is correct and in Classical Physics all is fine. However, if you increase the PD to say 30,000V you will find the electron traveling faster than the speed of light!

Your calculation doesn't account for the mass increase of the electron as it approaches the speed of light. For most School work it is fine though.
 


Yes, this answer is valid. The final speed of an electron can be calculated using the equation v=sqrt(2qV/m), where q is the charge of the electron, V is the potential difference, and m is the mass of the electron. Plugging in the given values for q, V, and m, we get a final speed of 4.2*10^7 m/s. This answer is valid because it follows the correct formula and uses the correct unit conversions. Additionally, the calculated speed is within a reasonable range for the speed of an electron in this scenario.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top