Find the Second Resonant length of an air column

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the second resonant length of an air column resonating at 1.0 kHz and 15 degrees Celsius, with calculations yielding a speed of sound of 340.85 m/s and a wavelength of 34.09 cm. For both closed and open air columns, the second resonant length is determined to be equal to the wavelength. It is clarified that in an open column, antinodes are at both ends, while in a closed column, nodes are at both ends, yet both configurations yield the same resonant length. The calculations are confirmed to be correct, and the conclusion is that both types of air columns have the same second resonant length of 34.09 cm. Understanding the differences in node and antinode placement is essential, but does not affect the numerical outcome in this case.
Spookie71
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the second resonant length of an air column that resonates with a sound of frequency 1.0 kHz at 15.0 degrees Celsius under each of the following conditions.

a) the air column is closed at both ends

b) the air column is open at both ends

Homework Equations


V_{s} = 332 m/s + T(0.59 m/s \circC)

v = f\lambda therefore \lambda = \frac{v}{f}

l = \frac{n \lambda}{2} therefore \frac{2l}{n} = \lambda

n = 2 for the second resonant length of an air column


The Attempt at a Solution


V_{s} = 332 m/s + T(0.59 m/s \circC)
332 m/s + 15(0.59 m/s)
= 340.85
-------------------------------------------------------------
v = f\lambda therefore \lambda = \frac{v}{f}

\frac{340.85 m/s}{1000 Hz}
= 34.09 cm
-------------------------------------------------------------

\frac{2l}{n} = \lambda

\lambda = \frac{2(34.09}{2}
= 34.09

--------------------------------------------------------

The second Resonant length is 34.09 cm
I don't know how to calculate the difference between an air column open at both ends
and an air column closed at both ends. My textbook doesn't explain it clearly. I'm guessing that both types of columns have different answers but as it stands I got the same calculation for both types. Is there more to the equation that I'm missing or am I doing the whole calculation wrong.

Thanks
S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In open air column open ends will be antinodes. So the second resonant length = wavelength. In closed air column closed ends will be nodes. So the second resonant length is also equal to wavelength.
 
Does that mean that both questions have the same answer?
 
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top