- #1

- 120

- 21

- Homework Statement
- Given below.

- Relevant Equations
- Given below.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter brochesspro
- Start date

Which means that the equation has been solved for ##a##.No, the following would not be another equation in the variables a, b and c due to the fact that the unknown vector is a unit vector. If yes, then we end up with 3 equations for the three variables, which now can be solved for a, b and c.$$a^2 + b^2 + c^2= 1$$We could find ##a## in terms of ##b## from first equation. Then from second equation, substituting ##a## in...$$\vec{a} = \frac{1}{bf

- #1

- 120

- 21

- Homework Statement
- Given below.

- Relevant Equations
- Given below.

- #2

- 914

- 1,229

(can you solve it faster another way? what are the properties of the cross product?)

- #3

- 574

- 328

Take the cross product of the two vectors and find its unit vector. Then negate it and you have your two answers.

- #4

- 120

- 21

Do you mean dot product?(can you solve it faster another way? what are the properties of the cross product?)

- #5

- 574

- 328

Do you mean dot product?

- #6

- 25,138

- 16,876

I think they meant the cross product!Do you mean dot product?

- #7

- 120

- 21

You gave me the answer too soon. It would have been better if you would have slowly led me to that conclusion.

Take the cross product of the two vectors and find its unit vector. Then negate it and you have your two answers.

- #8

- 120

- 21

I was only focusing on the perpendicular part and the fact that perpendicular vectors have dot product 0. And so, I completely forgot about cross products.I think they meant the cross product!

- #9

- 120

- 21

But still, thank you for the responses. Now I can solve this question on my own.

- #10

- 574

- 328

You gave me the answer too soon. It would have been better if you would have slowly led me to that conclusion.

Fair enough. Let’s back track. Can you prove that. Let’s justify this approach.

##(\vec{a} \times \vec{b}) \cdot \vec{b} = (\vec{a} \times \vec{b}) \cdot \vec{a} = 0##

- #11

- 25,138

- 16,876

That's a good point. You could look generate simultanenous equations by looking for a vector whose dot product with both those vectors is zero. Using the cross product could be quicker.I was only focusing on the perpendicular part and the fact that perpendicular vectors have dot product 0. And so, I completely forgot about cross products.

- #12

- 120

- 21

No need for it now, I already got the answer. But, thank you.Fair enough. Let’s back track. Can you prove that. Let’s justify this approach.

##(\vec{a} \times \vec{b}) \cdot \vec{b} = (\vec{a} \times \vec{b}) \cdot \vec{a} = 0##

View attachment 295004

- #13

- 120

- 21

I tried to do that itself. Could you once go through the attachments and guide me to what I have done wrong?That's a good point. You could look generate simultanenous equations by looking for a vector whose dot product with both those vectors is zero. Using the cross product could be quicker.

- #14

- 120

- 21

Never mind, I got the answer. Again, thank you for all your responses.I tried to do that itself. Could you once go through the attachments and guide me to what I have done wrong?

- #15

- 25,138

- 16,876

You got as far as $$2a -3b = 0$$$$-a + 4b - 5c =0$$And then things seemed to go a bit wrong. I just multiplied the second equation by ##2## and then added them.I tried to do that itself. Could you once go through the attachments and guide me to what I have done wrong?

Note that you are always going to have a free parameter here. In this case ##c## can be anything.

- #16

- 25,138

- 16,876

- #17

- 120

- 21

I am not sure about it. But, many people write it that way, I think it is used for points rather than vectors, but I may be wrong.

Yes, I noticed that I forgot to multiply the 4 by 2 and things went downhill from there. But, I can now do this both ways, the dot product way, and the cross product way. Goodbye for now.You got as far as $$2a -3b = 0$$$$-a + 4b - 5c =0$$And then things seemed to go a bit wrong. I just multiplied the second equation by ##2## and then added them.

Note that you are always going to have a free parameter here. In this case ##c## can be anything.

- #18

- 897

- 176

You got as far as $$2a -3b = 0$$$$-a + 4b - 5c =0$$And then things seemed to go a bit wrong. I just multiplied the second equation by ##2## and then added them.

Note that you are always going to have a free parameter here. In this case ##c## can be anything.

Wouldn't the following be another equation in the variables a, b and c due to the fact that the unknown vector is a unit vector? If yes, then we end up with 3 equations for the three variables, which now can be solved for a, b and c.

$$a^2 + b^2 + c^2= 1$$We could find ##a## in terms of ##b## from first equation. Then from second equation, substituting ##a## in terms of ##b##, we will get ##c## in terms of ##b##. Now, we substitute in above equation the variables ##a## and ##c##, and solve for ##b##. Knowing ##b## means we can determine ##a## and ##c##.

Last edited:

- #19

- 120

- 21

That is what I did, but with ##c##.Wouldn't the following be another equation in the variables a, b and c due to the fact that the unknown vector is a unit vector? If yes, then we end up with 3 equations for the three variables, which now can be solved for a, b and c.

$$a^2 + b^2 + c^2= 1$$We could find ##a## in terms of ##b## from first equation. Then from second equation, substituting ##a## in terms of ##b##, we will get ##c## in terms of ##b##. Now, we substitute in above equation the variables ##a## and ##c##, and solve for ##b##. Knowing ##b## means we can determine ##a## and ##c##.

- #20

- 897

- 176

That should give you two different unit vectors.That is what I did, but with ##c##.

- #21

- 120

- 21

Yes, I got them.

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 201

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 782

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 614

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 543

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 922

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 361

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 442

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 567

- Replies
- 39

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 899