Engineering Find thevenin circuit/ phasor domain

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on obtaining the Thevenin equivalent circuit from a given current source in the phasor domain. Participants detail the process of transforming the circuit, calculating impedances for capacitors and inductors, and applying node analysis to find the Thevenin voltage. There is confusion regarding the source transformation technique, particularly how to convert the current source into a voltage source while managing the associated impedances. Clarifications are provided about the correct arrangement of components and the importance of identifying parallel and series relationships in the circuit. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful analysis and verification of calculations to achieve the correct Thevenin equivalent.
asdf12312
Messages
198
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


obtain a thevenin equivalent circuit given that iS(t)=3cos(4x10^4)t A. to that end:
a) transform the circuit to the phasor domain.
b) apply source-transformation technique to obtain the thevenin equivalent circuit at terminals (a,b).
c) transform the phasor-domain thevenin circuit back to the time domain.

htwkf5.png

Homework Equations


Z(C) = -j/wC
Z(L) = jwL

The Attempt at a Solution


realizing that the phasor counterpart to the current was 3A, and given w=4x10^4, was able to calculate 1st the impedences of capacitor/inductor, Z(C) = -50j, and Z(L) = 40j.

combined Z(R1) + Z(L) to obtain Z1 = 25+40j
ignoring the 350/37ohm, was able to combine R2+Z(C) to obtain Z2= 35-50j

now tried node analysis, by designating V1 as the node just above the current source.
V1/Z1 + V1/Z2 - iS(t) = 0
V1/Z1 + V1/Z2 = iS(t)
V1/25+40j + V1/35-50j = 3

i could then find V(th) as V1*Z(C)/(Z(C)+R2). i haven't worked this out yet but can anyone tell me if this is the right approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like it will lead you to Vth.
 
(V1/25 + V1/35) + j(V1/40 - V1/50)= 3
0.0686(V1)+j0.005(V1)=3
V1= 3/(0.0686+j0.005) = 3<0 / 0.0688<4.17= 43.6<-4.17deg

V(th)=(V1*Z(C))/Z2 = [43.6<-4.17 * 50<-90]/61.033<-55
=2180<-94.17/61.033<-55= 35.72<-39.17deg = 35.72 cos(wt-39.17)

i do this right?
 
Last edited:
prety sure the math is right, not sure if the answer is though. the problem also asked to use source trasnformation but how to turn the current into voltage source. i could bring out the capacitor but then the voltage source would have an imaginry component only. how does this work?
 
Something's gone awry. V1 should be closer to 150V in magnitude. Vth will be higher, too.

edit: Check how you've dealt with your node equation. The math you've used looks suspect.
 
asdf12312 said:
prety sure the math is right, not sure if the answer is though. the problem also asked to use source trasnformation but how to turn the current into voltage source. i could bring out the capacitor but then the voltage source would have an imaginry component only. how does this work?

Find an impedance in parallel with the current source. Convert the current source and impedance to a Thevenin equivalent.
 
my initial issue in applying source transorfmation was that this left me with a voltage source with two eq. impedences on each side. however, i realize that of course they would be in series then...? I'm sorry i just learn these things kinda slow. so what i did was convert the current into voltage source by bringing out the capacitor impedence, since that's the only thing tha seems to be in parallel with it. multiplying magnitudes, 3<0*50<-90 i do indeed get 150cos(wt-90) as Vs(t)=V(th). Z1 would still be 25+40j. for the new value of Z2 on the right of the new voltage source i would add the 350/37ohm, so Z2 would instead be 44.46-50j. adding together Z1 and Z2 i would get Z(eq)=69.46-10j. i still am not sure this is the right way because it seems too easy.
 
The capacitor is not in parallel with the current source; there's a junction in the way where two other components join. And, it's the voltage at that junction that you need to find, so best leave it alone.

Instead, look at the 25Ω + 1mH series branch. It parallels the current source.
 
that is what i suspected, only for some reason i assumed Z1 was in series with it. 47.17<58*3<0 = 141.51<58deg for Vs(t). also calculated Z(eq) to be 60+40j since i should leave Z(C) alone for now, and the 350/37ohm as well. then V(th)=(Vs(t)*Z(C))/(Z(eq)+Z(C))= (141.51<58*50<-90)/(60-10j)=7075.5<-32 / 60.83<-9.46= 116.32<-22.54deg
 
Last edited:
  • #10
asdf12312 said:
that is what i suspected, only for some reason i assumed Z1 was in series with it. 47.17<58*3<0 = 173.98<58deg for Vs(t).this part is at least right?

173.98 doesn't look write for 3x47.
 
  • #11
sorry that was a mistake on my part. edited my post.
 
  • #12
asdf12312 said:
sorry that was a mistake on my part. edited my post.

Well, it looks much better now :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top