Find tme constant for discharging capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter UselessLadder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Constant
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the RC time constant from a lab experiment involving the discharge of a capacitor charged to 20 V. The user graphed voltage against time and derived an equation, y = 19.89e-0.02x, but is unsure how to extract the time constant from it. Suggestions include linearizing the data by plotting ln(V) against time to find the slope, which relates to the time constant. The time constant is estimated to be around 50 seconds based on the exponential trendline. The user acknowledges the method's effectiveness for their lab report despite initial confusion.
UselessLadder
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I have a quick question about applying the RC time constant formula for a lab report. In the lab, we charged a capacitor to 20 V and then let them discharge, recording the voltage every 10 seconds, up to 240 sec. Now I was asked to graph the time vs. voltage in excel, fit an exponential trendline and obtain an equation.

Homework Equations



The equation I got from my line is: y = 19.89e-0.02x

My lab manual gives the time constant formula as V = V0e-1/t , with t being the time constant.

I have to use the experimentally obtained equation to calculate the time constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



I see the V0 is very close to 20, so that makes sense, but I don't understand how to combine the two equations to get the time constant. It seems that V should be the final voltage, but I have 24 values, all of which would give a different x. I'm confused how to proceed from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UselessLadder said:

Homework Statement



Hi, I have a quick question about applying the RC time constant formula for a lab report. In the lab, we charged a capacitor to 20 V and then let them discharge, recording the voltage every 10 seconds, up to 240 sec. Now I was asked to graph the time vs. voltage in excel, fit an exponential trendline and obtain an equation.

Homework Equations



The equation I got from my line is: y = 19.89e-0.02x
I'm guessing you mean: $$V=(19.89V)e^{-(0.02)t}$$

My lab manual gives the time constant formula as V = V0e-1/t , with t being the time constant.
... they mean: $$V=V_0e^{-t/\tau}$$ where ##\tau## is the time constant.

The relation you have is for t=1s.

I have to use the experimentally obtained equation to calculate the time constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



I see the V0 is very close to 20, so that makes sense, but I don't understand how to combine the two equations to get the time constant. It seems that V should be the final voltage, but I have 24 values, all of which would give a different x. I'm confused how to proceed from here.

You can use the data point at t=1s - very sloppy:don't do this.

You can use the first few data points as an approximate straight line - the intersection of the best fit with the t axis will be close to the time constant.

Best approach is to linearize the graph ... plot y=ln(V) against x=t.
$$\ln|V|=\ln|V_0|-\frac{t}{\tau}$$ ... this is a straight line with intercept ##V_0## and slope ##1/\tau##. Find the slope.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Another way of doing this is to recognize that, in the excel fit to your data, that 0.02 is the reciprocal of the time constant (are there any additional significant figures?). So the time constant should be about 50 seconds. This should be roughly the same result you get using Simon's linear plot.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
^ That's it, I just had a brain freeze trying to derive the time constant from that exponent expression. Simon's method would produce a more precise value, but my manual specifically asked for an exponential trendline so I just did that and it gave me a close enough estimate for the purposes of this lab. Thanks both of you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top