Finding a constant from eigenfunction

terp.asessed
Messages
126
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Since Hamiltonian operator is:

Ĥ = - (ħ2/(2m))(delta)2 - A/r
where r = (x2+y2+z2)
(delta)2 = ∂2/∂x2 + ∂2/∂y2 + ∂2/∂z2
A = a constant

from Ĥg(r) = Eg(r) form, where:

g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)

with b, D as constants, is an EIGENFUNCTION of Ĥ, find the correct b and give the eigenvalue E.

Homework Equations


g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)

Ĥ = - (ħ2/(2m))(delta)2 - A/r
where r = (x2+y2+z2)
(delta)2 = ∂2/∂x2 + ∂2/∂y2 + ∂2/∂z2
D = a constant

The Attempt at a Solution


g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)
g'(r) = -De-r/b/b - De-r/b/b + Dre-r/b/b2
= -2De-r/b/b + Dre-r/b/b2
g''(r) = 3De-r/b/b2 - Dre-r/b/b3

[delta_g(r)]2 = 5De-r/b/b2 -Dre-r/b/b3 - 4De-r/b/(br)

Ĥg(r) = Eg(r)
- (ħ2/(2m))(5De-r/b/b2 -Dre-r/b/b3 - 4De-r/b/(br)) - A/r * (D e-r/b(1-r/b)) = E*D e-r/b (1-r/b)
..which is then reduced to:

-5ħ2/(2mb2) + ħ2r/(2mb3) + 4ħ2/(2mbr) - A/r + A/b = E (1-r/b)...I managed to cancel out constant D and e-r/b, but I am at loss how how to eliminate r?

Should I equivelate:
ħ2r/(2mb3) + 4ħ2/(2mbr) - A/r = -E(r/b) ? I tried this way, and still haven't managed to find a way to cancel out r...to make b an independent number...
With regard to E, if I am not wrong, I think Energy is that of an excited state, NOT ground state, except I haven't figured it out (for I have not gotten b constant), and have no idea which energy level it is...

Any hints or notices to my mistakes would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
terp.asessed said:

Homework Statement


Since Hamiltonian operator is:

Ĥ = - (ħ2/(2m))(delta)2 - A/r
where r = (x2+y2+z2)
(delta)2 = ∂2/∂x2 + ∂2/∂y2 + ∂2/∂z2
A = a constant

from Ĥg(r) = Eg(r) form, where:

g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)

with b, D as constants, is an EIGENFUNCTION of Ĥ, find the correct b and give the eigenvalue E.

Homework Equations


g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)

Ĥ = - (ħ2/(2m))(delta)2 - A/r
where r = (x2+y2+z2)
(delta)2 = ∂2/∂x2 + ∂2/∂y2 + ∂2/∂z2
D = a constant

The Attempt at a Solution


g(r) = D e-r/b(1-r/b)
g'(r) = -De-r/b/b - De-r/b/b + Dre-r/b/b2
= -2De-r/b/b + Dre-r/b/b2
g''(r) = 3De-r/b/b2 - Dre-r/b/b3

[delta_g(r)]2 = 5De-r/b/b2 -Dre-r/b/b3 - 4De-r/b/(br)

Ĥg(r) = Eg(r)
- (ħ2/(2m))(5De-r/b/b2 -Dre-r/b/b3 - 4De-r/b/(br)) - A/r * (D e-r/b(1-r/b)) = E*D e-r/b (1-r/b)
..which is then reduced to:

-5ħ2/(2mb2) + ħ2r/(2mb3) + 4ħ2/(2mbr) - A/r + A/b = E (1-r/b)...I managed to cancel out constant D and e-r/b, but I am at loss how how to eliminate r?

Should I equivelate:
ħ2r/(2mb3) + 4ħ2/(2mbr) - A/r = -E(r/b) ? I tried this way, and still haven't managed to find a way to cancel out r...to make b an independent number...
With regard to E, if I am not wrong, I think Energy is that of an excited state, NOT ground state, except I haven't figured it out (for I have not gotten b constant), and have no idea which energy level it is...

Any hints or notices to my mistakes would be appreciated!

\hat{H} g(r) = E g(r)

gives you an equation of the form:

\frac{\alpha}{r} + \beta + \gamma r = 0

where \alpha, \beta and \gamma are combinations of your constants: A, b, E.

That equation can only be true for all values of r if each coefficient is equal to zero, separately. So it must be that
\alpha = 0
\beta = 0
\gamma = 0

So if you figure out what \alpha, \beta and \gamma are in terms of your constants, you can get three equations for your two unknowns: E and b. That's too many, but it will turn out that the equations are redundant--the third one is a linear combination of the other two. So you can solve for E and b.

D cancels out, so you can't solve for it using the Schrodinger equation, but instead you have to choose D so that the integral of |g(r)|^2 over all space is equal to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes terp.asessed
Thank you for your reply! Btw, could you please clarify:

stevendaryl said:
the third one is a linear combination of the other two..

because, according to what you've said:

α = 4ħ2/(2mb) - A = 0 --> b = 2ħ2/(Am)
β = -5ħ2/(2mb2) + A/b = 0
γ = ħ2/(2mb3) + E/b = 0

...but I couldn't derive b from β and γ...does it mean I solved everything from the beginning wrong?

And

stevendaryl said:
D cancels out, so you can't solve for it using the Schrodinger equation, but instead you have to choose D so that the integral of |g(r)|^2 over all space is equal to 1.

For the last one, do you mean I need to normalize?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
terp.asessed said:
Thank you for your reply! Btw, could you pls clarify:
because, according to what you've said:

α = 4ħ2/(2mb) - A = 0 --> b = 2ħ2/(Am)
β = -5ħ2/(2mb2) + A/b = 0
γ = ħ2/(2mb3) + E/b = 0

...but I couldn't derive b from β and γ...does it mean I solved everything from the beginning wrong?
On the right-hand side of Schrodinger's equation for this case, you have
E g(r) = E D e^{-r/b} - (E D r/b) e^{-r/b}

So the equation for \beta should have E on the right-hand side of the equals.

But you can certainly solve for E using the equation for \gamma. You already know b from your equation for \alpha. Plug that into the equation for \gamma

For the last one, do you mean I need to normalize?

Yes. D is a normalization constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes terp.asessed
Thank you--I guess I figured out b and E, but may I ask what I should do with β? Can I use it to check b and E I found out?
 
terp.asessed said:
Thank you--I guess I figured out b and E, but may I ask what I should do with β? Can I use it to check b and E I found out?

When I looked at it, it seemed that the equation for \beta gave the same information as the equation for \gamma.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top