Finding a Normal Vector for a Plane Defined by Two Lines

AI Thread Summary
To find a normal vector for the plane defined by two lines, the user initially attempted to use the dot product but encountered inconsistencies in their equations. They were reminded that while they have three unknowns, only two independent equations exist, making the third dependent. The discussion emphasized that a normal vector is not unique; any scalar multiple of it is also a valid normal vector. To resolve the issue, it was suggested to impose a third condition, such as fixing one component, to achieve a unique solution. The user acknowledged an arithmetic error and expressed gratitude for the guidance.
fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let us have lines
(x+3)/2 = (y+2)/3 = (z-6)/-4
and
(x-5)/1 = (y+1)/-4 = (z+4)/1

Find a normal vector to the plane these two lines are on.

The Attempt at a Solution



I already know you can solve it by
s1 x s2 || n ; where s1 = (2, 3, -4) and s2 = (1, -4, 1)
but I am not interested in that atm.
I thought of another solution that I thought would be correct, but as it turns out, it doesn't seem to be.

What I did was use the dot product.
Let n = (A+3; B+2; C-6), because we know (-3, -2, 6) to be on the plane the lines are on.
Let us also find s3=s1+s2=(3, -1, -3), because we have 3 variables in the system, so we need 3 equations and s3 is also on the same plane as s1 and s2.

As we know, for a vector on the plane and a normal vector
n.s=0 (dot product)

So
n.s1=0
n.s2=0
n.s3=0

Yet when solving the system I end up with
11B-6C=-34
11B-6C=14
Which means I get no solutions out of it.
Where did I astray from logic?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure why you got no solutions, possibly an arithmetic error. You should get infinite solutions. You are correct that you have 3 unknowns but only two equations. But using the sum of the two vectors will not give you a linearly independent equation. Any solution to the first two will give you a solution to the third.

Remember that saying a vector is orthogonal to the plane does not define that vector uniquely. It only defines its direction. Given n is normal so is 5n and -3n. So you can either impose a third condition in the form of choosing the magnitude (which should give you a unique solution up to sign) or pick one of the components (judiciously since you may find one is necessarily zero) say the x component to be 1. I typically begin solving and choose, if I can, a value to avoid fractions in the vector components. Then I can if I like normalize the result.

[edit: P.S. It's great that you are exploring alternative methods and -so to speak- playing with the problem. That is how you really learn to understand the subject. Keep it up!]
 
jambaugh said:
I'm not sure why you got no solutions, possibly an arithmetic error. You should get infinite solutions. You are correct that you have 3 unknowns but only two equations. But using the sum of the two vectors will not give you a linearly independent equation. Any solution to the first two will give you a solution to the third.

Remember that saying a vector is orthogonal to the plane does not define that vector uniquely. It only defines its direction. Given n is normal so is 5n and -3n. So you can either impose a third condition in the form of choosing the magnitude (which should give you a unique solution up to sign) or pick one of the components (judiciously since you may find one is necessarily zero) say the x component to be 1. I typically begin solving and choose, if I can, a value to avoid fractions in the vector components. Then I can if I like normalize the result.

[edit: P.S. It's great that you are exploring alternative methods and -so to speak- playing with the problem. That is how you really learn to understand the subject. Keep it up!]

Ofcourse! And plus I had made an arithmetic error too, so I should have really thought this through. Thank you for your help!
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top