Finding a Normal Vector for a Plane Defined by Two Lines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a normal vector for a plane defined by two lines represented in parametric form. The lines are given as (x+3)/2 = (y+2)/3 = (z-6)/-4 and (x-5)/1 = (y+1)/-4 = (z+4)/1. The correct method to find the normal vector involves using the cross product of direction vectors s1 = (2, 3, -4) and s2 = (1, -4, 1). The user initially attempted to use the dot product but encountered inconsistencies due to an arithmetic error and misunderstanding of the linear independence of the equations derived from the vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector algebra, specifically cross products and dot products.
  • Familiarity with parametric equations of lines in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of linear independence and its implications in vector equations.
  • Basic arithmetic skills for solving systems of equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the cross product of vectors in three-dimensional space to find normal vectors.
  • Study the concept of linear independence and its role in vector equations.
  • Explore methods for solving systems of equations involving multiple variables.
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of normal vectors in relation to planes.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematicians working with vector calculus, and anyone interested in geometric interpretations of vector relationships in three-dimensional space.

fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let us have lines
(x+3)/2 = (y+2)/3 = (z-6)/-4
and
(x-5)/1 = (y+1)/-4 = (z+4)/1

Find a normal vector to the plane these two lines are on.

The Attempt at a Solution



I already know you can solve it by
s1 x s2 || n ; where s1 = (2, 3, -4) and s2 = (1, -4, 1)
but I am not interested in that atm.
I thought of another solution that I thought would be correct, but as it turns out, it doesn't seem to be.

What I did was use the dot product.
Let n = (A+3; B+2; C-6), because we know (-3, -2, 6) to be on the plane the lines are on.
Let us also find s3=s1+s2=(3, -1, -3), because we have 3 variables in the system, so we need 3 equations and s3 is also on the same plane as s1 and s2.

As we know, for a vector on the plane and a normal vector
n.s=0 (dot product)

So
n.s1=0
n.s2=0
n.s3=0

Yet when solving the system I end up with
11B-6C=-34
11B-6C=14
Which means I get no solutions out of it.
Where did I astray from logic?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure why you got no solutions, possibly an arithmetic error. You should get infinite solutions. You are correct that you have 3 unknowns but only two equations. But using the sum of the two vectors will not give you a linearly independent equation. Any solution to the first two will give you a solution to the third.

Remember that saying a vector is orthogonal to the plane does not define that vector uniquely. It only defines its direction. Given n is normal so is 5n and -3n. So you can either impose a third condition in the form of choosing the magnitude (which should give you a unique solution up to sign) or pick one of the components (judiciously since you may find one is necessarily zero) say the x component to be 1. I typically begin solving and choose, if I can, a value to avoid fractions in the vector components. Then I can if I like normalize the result.

[edit: P.S. It's great that you are exploring alternative methods and -so to speak- playing with the problem. That is how you really learn to understand the subject. Keep it up!]
 
jambaugh said:
I'm not sure why you got no solutions, possibly an arithmetic error. You should get infinite solutions. You are correct that you have 3 unknowns but only two equations. But using the sum of the two vectors will not give you a linearly independent equation. Any solution to the first two will give you a solution to the third.

Remember that saying a vector is orthogonal to the plane does not define that vector uniquely. It only defines its direction. Given n is normal so is 5n and -3n. So you can either impose a third condition in the form of choosing the magnitude (which should give you a unique solution up to sign) or pick one of the components (judiciously since you may find one is necessarily zero) say the x component to be 1. I typically begin solving and choose, if I can, a value to avoid fractions in the vector components. Then I can if I like normalize the result.

[edit: P.S. It's great that you are exploring alternative methods and -so to speak- playing with the problem. That is how you really learn to understand the subject. Keep it up!]

Ofcourse! And plus I had made an arithmetic error too, so I should have really thought this through. Thank you for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K