Finding angular velocity using work energy theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the work-energy theorem to find angular velocity, highlighting issues with the methods attempted. The first method fails due to the angular acceleration varying with cos(θ), making constant acceleration formulas inapplicable. The second method incorrectly uses potential energy as U = Mθ instead of U = mgh. Participants express confusion about the variable M and its relevance to the problem. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need to correctly account for gravitational effects when applying these principles.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


cmPVt.png


Homework Equations


Inertia about pin = ml^2/3
Work done by rotation = M*theta = 0.5(Inertia about pin) *ω2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried two different methods and both came out to be the same answer. However they did not correspond to any of the multiple choice answers... What am I doing wrong?

zsts9.jpg


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Method 1: The angular acceleration varies with \cos(\theta). So using constant acceleration formulas doesn't work. You simply can't use that method.

Method 2: The potential energy is still U=mgh, not U=M\theta.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Method 1: The angular acceleration varies with \cos(\theta). So using constant acceleration formulas doesn't work. You simply can't use that method.

Method 2: The potential energy is still U=mgh, not U=M\theta.

Thanks, but why does Mtheta not work?
 
I'm not even sure what M is.
 
frogjg2003 said:
I'm not even sure what M is.

Moment about the pin.
 
It's still wrong. It should be \frac{1}{2}M\omega. But that by itself contains no information about the fact it's in gravity.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top