Finding constant acceleration without time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of electrons in an X-ray tube given their final speed and the distance over which they are accelerated, without using time. Participants clarify that the equation Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad can be used to find acceleration, even though it omits time. This equation is derived from principles of energy and work, linking kinetic energy to the work done by a constant force. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding kinematic equations, particularly the SUVAT equations, for solving such problems. Ultimately, the participants confirm that the formula used is valid and effective for this scenario.
Uriah Graves
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
An X-ray tube gives electrons constant acceleration over a distance of 14 cm . If their final speed is 1.0×107 m/s , what are the electrons' acceleration?
Express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.

Homework Equations


My prof. has provided me with a series of kinematic equations to use to solve for constant acceleration. None of them allow me to solve this without "t" time. This problem does not give me time. For this reason, I resorted to the internet to get help.

I have noticed many people use a = [Vf2 - Vi2] / [2d] for a very similar question, but I am unsure where that formula comes from, as I thought acceleration was a difference of velocity/time, not a difference of velocity/2*distance.

I have solved this equation with Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad. I am not sure where this formula comes from either, but using it worked.

The Attempt at a Solution


3.6*10^14 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uriah Graves said:
My prof. has provided me with a series of kinematic equations to use to solve for constant acceleration. None of them allow me to solve this without "t" time.
There are five standard equations for constant acceleration. Using u and v for initial and final velocities and a, s (your d), and t as the others, they are known as the SUVAT equations. (Google that.) Each equation omits one of the five, so yes, there is one without time. These are worth learning.
Uriah Graves said:
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
That is indeed the equation, and it is the same as the other you quoted, just rearranged. (Vf2 meaning Vf2.)
 
I will Google that! This is exactly why I am here! Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post! I genuinely appreciate it!
 
Uriah Graves said:
I have solved this equation with Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad. I am not sure where this formula comes from either, but using it worked.
One way of looking at this equation is as a description of work done by a constant force. Multiply every term by m. Now you have $$mv_f^2 = mv_i^2 + 2mad$$Now, if we we divide every term by two and substitute in for ##F=ma## we wind up with$$\frac{1}{2}mv_f^2=\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2 + Fd$$Which is simply a statement that the final energy is equal to the initial energy plus work done.

[I went through first year physics without ever memorizing this particular SUVAT formula. I re-cast every relevant problem in terms of energy and work and solved them that way]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top