Finding density of air in air column from just pressure?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the density of air in a stairwell based on pressure measurements taken at different heights. The pressure difference recorded was 52.6 torr, which was converted to 7012.7 Pa. The participant initially calculated the mass of air in a column but ended up with an implausibly high density of 41.87 kg/m^3, while the expected atmospheric density is around 1.3 kg/m^3. The conclusion drawn is that the original pressure measurements may be inaccurate, prompting the participant to note this potential error in their lab report. Accurate pressure readings are crucial for reliable density calculations in this context.
mroldboy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is for a lab I finished but cannot get this question, I spoke with the TA today and she made it make sense but I am still not getting the question correct.

(2) The difference in pressure between the lowest and the highest measurement point is related to the weight of air between these points. Use your observations to calculate the density of air between these points? How does this number compare with the textbook density at 24oC? (Hint – convert your measurements to pounds per square inch and figure out how many pounds of air you observed in a column of air that is 1 inch square by the height of the stairs.)

For the lab we build a pressure sensor and measured pressure at 5 heights in a stairwell. The pressures increased from 692.5 torr to 745.12 torr, so a difference in pressure of 52.6 torr.

No temperature readings, just pressure was taken.
The height from the bottom to the highest meaurement was 17.094 meters.

Homework Equations



Not sure what equations would be relevant. F=mg or conversion factors.

The Attempt at a Solution



I first converted the 52.6 torr to Pa, 1torr=133.332Pa.

7012.7 Pa or N/m^2, but got stuck here.

then I tried converting the torr to psi, got 1.017 psi. Multiplied that by the height of the column of air I want to find the mass of and got 684.4 pounds. But now what? divide that by the volume, then i just get the same number since the volume is 673 in^3.

I'm sure I'm just missing something here.

Ok, I think I got it.

converted 52.6 torr to 7012.7 N/m^2.
P=F/area(m^2) --> 7012.7 N
7012.7 N = m x g
715.7 N/(m/s^2) --> 715.7 kg / 17.094 m^3 = 41.87 kg/m^3

But that density seems really high, shouldn't atmospheric density be around 1.3kg/m^3

Am I using the wrong volume? I am pretty confident in the mass, I think?

to get a density around 1.3 I would need a volume of around 550m^3.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is something wrong with your measurements. There is no way that the pressure will increase that much due to the weight of a 17 m column of air.
AM
 
thats what I am thinking now, that my calculations are fine, but the original measurements are wrong. Which is completely possible considering we just connected a data logger to a pressure sensor with random wire and such.

I'll note it in my lab report as an error.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top