Finding Dipole Moment: Solve Integral & Calculate \vec p

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294

Homework Statement



Given a sphere radius R with surface charge density \rho_s=k\;cos\theta. Find the dipole moment \;\vec p.

Homework Equations



\vec p=\int \vec r'\rho_s \;d a = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\vec r' k\;cos\theta\; R^2d\theta\;d\phi

The Attempt at a Solution



To me, \vec r' = \hat R R in spherical coordinates. But the book claimed from the charge density distribution, \vec p = \hat z p which make sense so the book assumed \;\vec r'=\hat z z = \hat z R\;cos\theta. This all make sense.

My real question is what if I don't know the direction of the \vec p by looking at the charge distribution, how am I going to do the integration and find \vec p? If I just use \vec r' = \hat R R, the answer won't be correct. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Resolve the vector r into x, y, and z components, expressed in polar coordinates and calculate these components by separate integrals. You will see that both the x and y components cancel.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Resolve the vector r into x, y, and z components, expressed in polar coordinates and calculate these components by separate integrals. You will see that both the x and y components cancel.

ehild

I got it, thanks for your help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top