Finding E Field at Point from non uniform charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P(0,0,4) due to a non-uniform charge density along the z-axis, given by 10|z| (nC/m). Participants clarify the correct expression for the position vector R, emphasizing that it should vary with z, leading to R = (4 - z)az. The initial misunderstanding about the absolute value of z is resolved, confirming that R should differ for z = +2 and z = -2. Ultimately, the correct electric field value is determined to be E = 34.20 az (V/m). The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining vectors in electrostatic calculations.
fmpak93
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Portion of z-axis for which |z| < 2 carries a non uniform charge density of 10|z| (nC/m). Using cylindrical coordinates, determine E in free space at P(0,0,4). Explicitly show your integration.

Homework Equations


E = (1/4πε0) ∫ dQ*aR/(R2)

The Attempt at a Solution


https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11004892_945246908827650_417954135_n.jpg?oh=d538ef93ebc53d426c29d8a2f0116327&oe=54ECD699&__gda__=1424795396_496617364f01c6d9bac875a291ef70af
I don't know what I'm doing wrong. the linear charge lies on the z axis and the point of interest lies on (0,0,4) so only the z unit vector applies right? As shown in the paper, the real answer is E = 34.20 az (V/m).
I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Everything looks good except for your expression for ##\vec{R}##. Try evaluating your expression for z = +2 and z = -2. Does it make sense?
 
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Everything looks good except for your expression for ##\vec{R}##. Try evaluating your expression for z = +2 and z = -2. Does it make sense?

I would assume the R vector we can find as the difference in points between the source and destination. So our destination point is P(0,0,4), and our source charge point would have to be (0,0,|z|). Thus making our vector R = (4-|z|)az. Is this correct?
 
fmpak93 said:
Thus making our vector R = (4-|z|)az. Is this correct?

No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?
 
TSny said:
No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?

Oh I see, it shouldn't. The absolute factor only applies to the charge density, the length of the position vector will still vary from top to bottom like always. So then just R = (4-z)?
 
TSny said:
No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?

Never-mind, you were right. I got the answer. THANKS! :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top