Finding electric field incident on a medium

zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
\Gamma

Homework Statement


if an electric field is traveling in air and hits a medium n2. then there will be three fields present:

the incident electric field
the reflected electric field
and the transmitted electric field.

the electric field in medium 1 would be:

E(z,t)=Ei(exp(-jkz)+\Gammaexp(jkz))cos(wt-kz) assuming it is traveling in the z direction

where gamma is the reflection cofficent and Ei is incident amplitude of the field.


and the felid in medium two would be:
E(z,t)=Ei(\tauexp(-jkz))cos(wt-kz) where tau is the transmission coffecient

i was wondering if the angle of incidence any affect of the fields. for example if the original e field was incident on the normal angle would it affect the field in medium 2 or the relfected field. if so how?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle of incidence is actually quite important since the transmission and reflexion coefficient are function of the incidence angle (I think they are usually called Fresnel coefficient; actually the square modulus are the Fresnel coefficient). Furthermore, the transmitted angle is also function of the incident angle (See Snell-Descartes law).

I would also suggest that you don't mix complex wave and cosine wave expression since they complicate a lot any attempt when working with waves.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top