Finding individual impedance given the magnitude.

AI Thread Summary
In a parallel circuit with a 10-H inductor, a 200-Ω resistor, and an unknown capacitor C, the goal is to find C given that the magnitude of the impedance is 125Ω at ω=100 rad/s. The discussion reveals confusion over calculating the equivalent impedance, particularly in distinguishing between magnitude and complex impedance. Participants suggest using the formula for parallel impedances and express the need to keep calculations algebraic until the end to avoid clutter. It is clarified that the magnitude of the impedance can be derived from the real and imaginary components of the equivalent impedance. Ultimately, the correct approach involves squaring the real and imaginary parts and equating it to the known magnitude to solve for C.
Basher1
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A 10-H inductor, 200-Ω resistor and a capacitor C are in parallel. find C if the magnitude of the impedance is 125Ω at ω=100rad/s




Now i attempted to solve it by first doing the parallel combination of the inductor and the resistor. Then i would do the parallel combo of these with the capacitor with the variable C. This left me with a massive equation. I am sure there has to be an easier way. please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to pf!

Hi Basher1! Welcome to pf! :smile:

The total impedance is 1/(1/Z1 +1/Z2 + 1/Z3) :wink:

Show us what you get :smile:
 
hello Tiny tim. I've tried adding the impedance of the inductor and resistior then trying to find the unknown capacitance. but i was given the magnitude of the impedance. I wasn't given anything in rectangular form.
 
Show us what you get. :smile:
 
ZR = 200Ω,
ZL = j1000Ω
ZC = 1/j100CΩ
ω = 100rad/
magnitude of impedance = 125Ω

Zeq = (200 + j1000)/(200.j1000) + j100C = 0.008

= (200 x 10^6) + (40 x 10^6)j/(4 x 10^10) + j100C = 0.008

= (5 x 10^-3) + (1 x 10^-3)j + (j100C) = 0.008

=> (j100C) = 0.003 + j(0.001)


C = (0.003 + j(0.001))/(j100)
clearly a capacitance cannot have an imaginary value. I have no idea what I'm doing. personally i thought you would require a phase angle to accompany the magnitude of the impedance in order to solve so that we could get a reactance and resitive component and thus i could equate coefficients.
 
Last edited:
Basher1 said:
ZR = 200Ω,
ZL = j1000Ω
ZC = 1/j100CΩ
ω = 100rad/
magnitude of impedance = 125Ω

Zeq = (200 + j1000)/(200.j1000) + j100C = 0.008

= (200 x 10^6) + (40 x 10^6)j/(4 x 10^10) + j100C = 0.008

= (5 x 10^-3) + (1 x 10^-3)j + (j100C) = 0.008

=> (j100C) = 0.003 + j(0.001) C = (0.003 + j(0.001))/(j100)
clearly a capacitance cannot have an imaginary value. I have no idea what I'm doing. personally i thought you would require a phase angle to accompany the magnitude of the impedance in order to solve so that we could get a reactance and resitive component and thus i could equate coefficients.

All three of the impedances are in parallel. So why are you adding them as though only two of them are in parallel, and the third is in series with the other two?

EDIT: Hmm, no sorry, my mistake. I see that your operation is correct after all. I'll reply momentarily with further comments.
 
Last edited:
No that's ok.

I would like to hear your feedback
 
It's your second line that's wrong. Zeq-1 is NOT equal to 1/125 (0.008), because 125 Ω is just the *magnitude* of the impedance: |Zeq|. The impedance Zeq is in general a complex number.
 
so (4 x 10^10)/((200 x 10^6) + (40 x 10^6)j + (4 x 10^12)jC) = Zeq?

If i rationalise this I end up with a massive value and a c^2. there has to be an easier way?
 
  • #10
Basher1 said:
so (4 x 10^10)/((200 x 10^6) + (40 x 10^6)j + (4 x 10^12)jC) = Zeq?

If i rationalise this I end up with a massive value and a c^2. there has to be an easier way?

I'm having a lot of trouble following your arithmetic, for instance where the 200e6 and 40e6 come from.

Personally, I'd prefer to keep things algebraic until the very end. Things become a lot less cluttered, and it's just nicer to end up with a general solution for the equivalent impedance of any parallel LRC circuit that you then plug numbers into for your specific situation.

The easiest way I've found so far is as follows (I'll just omit the "eq" subscript and call the equivalent impedance "Z"). So we have:

Z-1 = (1/R) + (1/jωL) + jωC

Note that 1/j = -j, so you can express this as:

Z-1 = (1/R) - j(1/ωL) + jωC

= (1/R) + j[ωC - 1/ωL]

So now you have Z-1 expressed as a complex number in rectangular form (i.e. with a real part and an imaginary part, as opposed to polar form, which has a magnitude and a phase). How would compute the magnitude of this number using the real part and the imaginary part? I.e. how do you find |Z-1|? How is |Z| (which is what you are trying to solve for) related to |Z-1|?
 
  • #11
argh yes i was complicating things. Square the real part, imaginary part, take the root of the entire thing. equate this to 1/125. thankyou cepheid
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top