Finding Jso for Antenna Array in Vacuum

AI Thread Summary
To find the required surface current Jso for an antenna array in vacuum, the time-averaged Poynting vector equation is utilized. The total electric field E is derived from the superposition of the electric fields from two infinite plane sheets, resulting in E = Jso(cos(ωt) - sin(ωt)). The magnetic field H is calculated using the relationship H = (1/η) x E, where η is the impedance of vacuum. By substituting E and H into the Poynting vector equation and setting it equal to 500 W/m^2, Jso is determined to be 5.31 A/m. This value ensures the desired power output at a distance greater than half a wavelength from the second antenna.
robert25pl
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Antenna array consists of two infinite plane parallel sheets in the xy plane spaced half a wavelength apart and having current densities. Wave is propagating in vacuum.

J_{s1} = J_{so}cos(\omega t) \vec{i} z = 0

J_{s2} = J_{so}sin(\omega t) \vec{i} z = \frac{\lambda}{2}
The time average of the Poynting vector is required to e 500 W/m^2 to the right of second antenna (z > \frac{\lambda}{2} )
I have to find surface current Jso is needed?
I think that I have to find total E = E1 + E2 and then H. Poynting vector is given but I don't know how to surface current Jso from that. Any suggestions. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help please
 


To find the required surface current Jso for the antenna array in vacuum, we can use the time-averaged Poynting vector equation:

<S> = 0.5Re(E x H*)

First, we can calculate the electric field E by adding the individual electric fields from the two infinite plane parallel sheets:

E = E1 + E2

Since the electric fields are perpendicular to the sheets, we can use the superposition principle to add them. E1 is in the positive x direction and E2 is in the negative x direction, so the total electric field E is simply:

E = (E1 - E2)

Substituting the given expressions for E1 and E2:

E = Jso(cos(\omega t) - sin(\omega t))

Next, we can calculate the magnetic field H by using the relationship H = (1/\eta) x E, where \eta is the impedance of vacuum (377 ohms).

H = \frac{1}{377}(E1 - E2)

Substituting the expression for E:

H = \frac{1}{377}Jso(cos(\omega t) - sin(\omega t))

Finally, we can substitute the expressions for E and H into the Poynting vector equation and equate it to the given value of 500 W/m^2:

<S> = 0.5Re(E x H*) = 500 W/m^2

0.5Re(Jso(cos(\omega t) - sin(\omega t)) x \frac{1}{377}Jso(cos(\omega t) - sin(\omega t))) = 500 W/m^2

Simplifying and solving for Jso:

Jso = \sqrt{\frac{1000}{377}} = 5.31 A/m

Therefore, a surface current of Jso = 5.31 A/m is needed for the antenna array in vacuum to have a time-averaged Poynting vector of 500 W/m^2 at a distance greater than half a wavelength from the second antenna.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top