Finding KE when given de Broglie wavelength

AI Thread Summary
To find the kinetic energy (KE) of a proton with a de Broglie wavelength of 10 fm, the relevant equations are wavelength = h/mv and KE = (1/2)(m)(v^2). The calculated velocity was 0.03962 m/s, leading to a KE of approximately 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV. A common mistake noted in the discussion was the confusion between units, specifically the need to keep all inputs in SI units for accurate calculations. Proper unit conversion is crucial for obtaining the correct kinetic energy value.
vspectra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Finding KE when given de Broglie wavelength

Homework Statement


What is the kinetic energy, in MeV, of a proton with a de Broglie wavelength of 10fm?
1 MeV = 10^6 eV
1 fm = 10^-15m
1 eV = 1.602 x 10^-19 J
h = 6.63 x 10^-34 Js
wavelength = 10 x 10^-15 m = 10^-5 nm
Mass proton = 1.673 x 10^-27 kg


Homework Equations



wavelength = h/mv
KE = (1/2)(m)(v^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I did this right, but I still got the incorrect answer and I can't seem to notice what I did wrong.

v = (6.63 x 10^-34) / (10^-5)(1.673 x 10^-27) = .03962 m/s
K = .5(1.673 x 10^-27)(.03862^2) = 1.316 x 10^-30 J = 8.2 x 10^-12 eV
= 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,
vspectra said:
v = (6.63 x 10^-34) / (10^-5)(1.673 x 10^-27) = .03962 m/s
K = .5(1.673 x 10^-27)(.03862^2) = 1.316 x 10^-30 J = 8.2 x 10^-12 eV
= 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV
Shouldn't that be 10*10-15? :wink:
 
Hootenanny said:
Welcome to PF,

Thanks.

Hootenanny said:
Shouldn't that be 10*10-15? :wink:



I tried that the first time I did the problem, and realized 10 x 10^-15 is in meters. Wouldn't I need the wavelength to be in nm? So it would be 1 x 10^-5 nm.
 
Last edited:
vspectra said:
I tried that the first time I did the problem, and realized 10 x 10^-15 is in meters. Wouldn't I need the wavelength to be in nm? So it would be 1 x 10^-5 nm.
Why would you want it in nm? If you want your output velocity to be in m/s, then all your inputs must be in SI units.
 
Ah, you're right, silly me. I was looking at another example which was basically the same question, and to me it looked like they converted from angstroms to nanometers for wavelength. It was actually converted to meters.

Thanks!
 


Hey thanks both of u :) i made the same mistake :p
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top