Finding KE when given de Broglie wavelength

AI Thread Summary
To find the kinetic energy (KE) of a proton with a de Broglie wavelength of 10 fm, the relevant equations are wavelength = h/mv and KE = (1/2)(m)(v^2). The calculated velocity was 0.03962 m/s, leading to a KE of approximately 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV. A common mistake noted in the discussion was the confusion between units, specifically the need to keep all inputs in SI units for accurate calculations. Proper unit conversion is crucial for obtaining the correct kinetic energy value.
vspectra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Finding KE when given de Broglie wavelength

Homework Statement


What is the kinetic energy, in MeV, of a proton with a de Broglie wavelength of 10fm?
1 MeV = 10^6 eV
1 fm = 10^-15m
1 eV = 1.602 x 10^-19 J
h = 6.63 x 10^-34 Js
wavelength = 10 x 10^-15 m = 10^-5 nm
Mass proton = 1.673 x 10^-27 kg


Homework Equations



wavelength = h/mv
KE = (1/2)(m)(v^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I did this right, but I still got the incorrect answer and I can't seem to notice what I did wrong.

v = (6.63 x 10^-34) / (10^-5)(1.673 x 10^-27) = .03962 m/s
K = .5(1.673 x 10^-27)(.03862^2) = 1.316 x 10^-30 J = 8.2 x 10^-12 eV
= 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,
vspectra said:
v = (6.63 x 10^-34) / (10^-5)(1.673 x 10^-27) = .03962 m/s
K = .5(1.673 x 10^-27)(.03862^2) = 1.316 x 10^-30 J = 8.2 x 10^-12 eV
= 8.2 x 10^-18 MeV
Shouldn't that be 10*10-15? :wink:
 
Hootenanny said:
Welcome to PF,

Thanks.

Hootenanny said:
Shouldn't that be 10*10-15? :wink:



I tried that the first time I did the problem, and realized 10 x 10^-15 is in meters. Wouldn't I need the wavelength to be in nm? So it would be 1 x 10^-5 nm.
 
Last edited:
vspectra said:
I tried that the first time I did the problem, and realized 10 x 10^-15 is in meters. Wouldn't I need the wavelength to be in nm? So it would be 1 x 10^-5 nm.
Why would you want it in nm? If you want your output velocity to be in m/s, then all your inputs must be in SI units.
 
Ah, you're right, silly me. I was looking at another example which was basically the same question, and to me it looked like they converted from angstroms to nanometers for wavelength. It was actually converted to meters.

Thanks!
 


Hey thanks both of u :) i made the same mistake :p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top