Finding Matrix A of Orthogonal Projection onto Line L in R2

AI Thread Summary
To find the matrix A for the orthogonal projection onto the line L spanned by the vector [2 5]T in R2, the correct slope must be determined. The slope of the line represented by the vector is 5/2, not -2/5, indicating a misunderstanding in the initial calculations. Using the correct slope, the projection matrix formula is applied to derive the matrix A. The confusion arises from the incorrect line equation, which does not align with the vector's direction. Ultimately, accurately identifying the line's slope is crucial for constructing the correct projection matrix.
sonya
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Find the matrix A of the orthogonal projection onto the line L in R2 that consists of all scalar multiples of the vector [2 5]T .

OK...I really don't know how to start off with this problem. If somehow could just help me out there I will try to muddle my way through the rest ! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK...now I've thought about this...I should use the formula
1/(1+m2) [1 m ]
________[m m2]

using 2x+5y = 0 my slope m = -2/5

but my numbers come out backwards ...
 
Your line is supposed to contain scalar multiples of [2 5]^T. Quick test-is [2 5]^T on the line 2x+5y = 0?
 
ok...now I'm really lost! I thought I made an equation from the given vector...so what do I do instead ?
 
You do make a line from the vector. Find two points on the line spanned by the vector, (0,0) and (2,5) will work. The y-intercept is therefore 0 and the slope is (5-0)/(2-0)=5/2. The line you gave has -2/5, so something was off.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Orthogonal basis to find projection onto a subspace
Replies
5
Views
4K
Orthogonal Projection and Reflection: Finding the Image of a Point x = (4,3)
Replies
7
Views
2K
Find matrix corresponding to Linear Tranformation (Orth. Projection)
Replies
7
Views
2K
Proof regarding orthogonal projections onto spans
Replies
1
Views
2K
Line maximizing orthogonal projections
Replies
11
Views
3K
Standard Matrix for an orthogonal projection transformation
Replies
3
Views
7K
Matrix of orthogonal projection
Replies
3
Views
8K
MHB How Can We Find the Minimum 2-Norm of Ax-y Using an Orthogonal Matrix?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Moving in a straight line with multiple constraints
2
Replies
98
Views
5K
Finding the Eigenstuff of a Orthogonal Projection onto a plane
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top