Finding maximum bending moment when shear force equation is known

Kasthuri
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the Maximum Bending Moment of the bridge section using the values given.
Ra = 61837.91667 N
Rb = 78304.5833 N
(please refer to attached diagram)

Homework Equations



shear force is = 0 when x = 13.755998 m
(I worked this distance and the shear force equation out and found it to be correct)

Shear force equation is: v = (950/13)x2 + 3490.096154x - 61837.91667

The Attempt at a Solution



The Attempt at a Solution



Integrate shear force equation:
∫(950/13)x2 + 3490.096154x - 61837.91667

= (950/39)x3 + (3490.096154/2)x2 - 61837.91667x + C

when x = 0, c = 0

Maximum bending moment = (950/39)x3 + (3490.096154/2)x2 - 61837.91667x when x = 13.755998 m

∴ Maximum bending moment = -457024.4582 Nm

BUT, I know that the max bending moment is definitely not the answer I calculated.

Any help you can offer me will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • maximum bending moment.JPG
    maximum bending moment.JPG
    43.5 KB · Views: 1,459
on Phys.org
First, restrict your calculations to four significant figures, to reduce errors (ironically). Then check with standard formula WL/6 where W is the total load. That is for the triangular load. Add WL/8 for the UDL. Since first writing this I have found an error in your work The coefficient 950/13 for the x^2 term needs checking. In general you would do better to work in kN units.
 
Last edited:
Your shear force equation is wrong. To check, substitute x = 0 and x = 26, and get the corresponding shear values. Check these with the reactions to see if the bridge is in equilibrium.
 
Kasthuri: Your shear force equation appears correct. Your maximum bending moment in post 1 appears correct. Nice work. I currently do not know why you, and others, currently seem to think it is wrong. Why do you think your answer is wrong?
 
I reiterate, your shear force equation is incorrect.
Where does the factor 950/13 come from? The load diagram clearly states that q at the right end of the bridge is 3800 N/m.
Why do you take Ra as negative in the shear force equation?
Clearly, if you evaluate the shear force equation at x = 0, you should obtain a shear force equal to the reaction at A.
Your bending moment calculation won't be correct until you get the correct shear force equation.
 
This is the shear force equation: (I missed the '2' initially, I'm sorry for that!)

v = (9250/13)x2 + 3490.096154x - 61837.9166

So through integrating from x = 0 to x = 13.756m I get that bending moment:
MAX BM = 885754.75 Nm
 
SteamKing said:
I reiterate, your shear force equation is incorrect.
Where does the factor 950/13 come from? The load diagram clearly states that q at the right end of the bridge is 3800 N/m.
Why do you take Ra as negative in the shear force equation?
Clearly, if you evaluate the shear force equation at x = 0, you should obtain a shear force equal to the reaction at A.
Your bending moment calculation won't be correct until you get the correct shear force equation.

I just now realized that it isn't in equilibrium, thanks.
Ignore my earlier comment. I looked back on my working and found the 950/13 comes from the weight of the triangular loading:
W = 1/2(base)(height)
= 1/2(x)(3800/26)(x)
= 950/13(x^2)
 
I have fixed my shear force equation and integrated it:
∫ - (950/13)x2 - 3490.096154x + 61837.91667 from x = 0 to x = 13.756 metres:

BM = 61837.91667x - (3490.096154x2)/2 - [(950/13)]x3/3

so integrating from x=0 to x=13.756m:

BM max = 457024.483 Nm
 
Sorry, but 1/2(x)*(3800/26)*x is NOT equal to (950/13)*x^2
 
  • #10
Cancel last post. Sorry.
 
  • #11
Thank you so much for your help SteamKing! :D
I got it right :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K