Finding Phase Shift in RLC Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the phase shift in an RLC circuit with specified resistance, capacitance, and inductance at a given frequency. The initial attempts to find the phase shift using the inverse tangent formula led to results around -1.5 radians, but these were deemed incorrect. A participant confirmed that the current lags the voltage by approximately -1.54 radians, suggesting that the textbook might have rounded the answer prematurely. Another participant recalculated the phase shift to be around -1.44 radians, indicating potential discrepancies in the provided answers. The conversation highlights the complexities of phase shift calculations in RLC circuits and the importance of precise values.
jacksonwiley
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An RLC circuit has a resistance of 2.0 kΩ, a capacitance of 8.0 µF, and an inductance of 9.0 H. If the frequency of the alternating current is 4.0/π kHz, what is the phase shift between the current and the voltage?
A) -1.6 rad
B) -1.5 rad
C) 36 rad
D) 3.1 rad



Homework Equations



Tan-1 (XL-Xc/R)


The Attempt at a Solution



at first i thought that since current phasors lag by 90 degrees that it may be -1.5 rads. but that isn't correct.
then i used the the inverse tangent equation above in hopes of finding the angle which came out to be 88.4 degrees (which is about 1.5 rads)
i then took the 88.4 degrees and subtracted it from 90 degrees, because I thought it might turn out a correct answer because the phasors are perpendicular to each other. but that gives you 1.6 which is not correct either.
I'm not sure what equation to use ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is correct, the current lags the voltage by 1.54 rad. The book might have rounded off too early, so it can be A or B. ehild
 
ehild said:
Your work is correct, the current lags the voltage by 1.54 rad. The book might have rounded off too early, so it can be A or B.


ehild

yeah that's what i thought, but i submitted both of those and neither is correct but i think that may be a mistake! thanks!
 
I calculated -1.44 rad:
w = 8 rad/s
angle = tan-1{(8*9 - 1/64e-6)/2e3} = tan-1(-7.78) = -82.7 deg = -1.443 rad.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top