Finding Stress Concentration Factor K for Chamfered Joints

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the stress concentration factor (K) for chamfered joints, specifically at the transition between two diameters of a rod. The original poster is familiar with calculating K for filleted joints but struggles to find resources for chamfered joints, noting a lack of references in standard texts like Peterson's or Roark's. Suggestions include modeling the chamfer as a very small radius in CAD software like SolidWorks for stress analysis, as real stress results from sharp corners are difficult to obtain. Participants emphasize the challenges of accurately calculating stress concentrations at sharp corners and recommend treating the chamfer as a fillet for conservative estimates. Overall, the consensus is that while precise calculations for chamfers are complex, modeling techniques can provide useful insights.
patrickv
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a rod of two different diameters and I'm trying to find the stress concentration at the chamfer between the two diameters. I understand how to find the stress concentration factor, K, if the joint was a fillet (using r/d and D/d to find K in the appropriate table). However I can't find any way of getting K for a chamfered joint. Please help point me in some direction. Thanks so much. I've attached a quick diagram showing the filleted and chamfered versions of the shaft. The chamfered one is the actual piece I'm trying to find K for.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I would make a model in SolidWorks or some other CAD program, and do stress analysis. Should be pretty easy.
 
There is no reference in either Peterson's or Roark's for this. I do remember Q_Goest having the same post a year or so ago. You may want to do a search for that thread. I can not remember what conclusion he came to. I would start by treating it as a very small radius, which in reality is the truth. You will not machine a perfectly sharp corner.
 
Brian_C said:
I would make a model in SolidWorks or some other CAD program, and do stress analysis. Should be pretty easy.

Chamfers are by definition sharp corners. Getting real stress results from a sharp corner numerically is quite a challenge, dare I say impossible. It's hard enough getting real stress numbers in a fillet where you can actually get grid to follow the surface.

You may have to assume a filleted case and take some sort of worst conservative case.
 
Last edited:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Back
Top