Finding Tension in Rotating Rod: What is the Function of T(x)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the tension in a rotating rod as a function of distance from the axis of rotation. The initial attempt at the solution involves integrating the equation for tension, but the user encounters a negative result. Participants point out that the integration limits and the sign in the tension equation may be incorrect. Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of density and the proper formulation of the tension change, emphasizing that the change in tension should be expressed as dT rather than -dT. The conversation concludes with the user acknowledging the corrections.
manasi bandhaokar
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
a thin uniform rod of length l and density d is rotating with angular velocityω about an axis passing through one of its ends and perpendicular to it.find the tension int the rod as a function of x.(x= dist from axis of rotation).area of cross section = a

attempt at solution:

consider a small of length dx at dist x from axis.
upload_2016-4-24_21-45-30.png

for equilibrium of rod T = T-dT + dmω^2 x
dT = dm ω^2 x
integrating
T(x) =(d * a* ω^2 (x^2 - l^2))/2
this is negative of answer.where am i wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess that a and d are the cross-sectional area and the density of the rod, respectively.

Your second equation, the one for dT, seems ok to me. I do not understand how can you obtain your last result from it. What are the limits of your integral?
Seems to me you're missing a sign in the integration, or, equivalently, you are swapping the integration limits.
 
Further to @FranzDiCoccio 's comments, since it is a thin rod I would interpret "density" as meaning mass per unit length. You do not need a variable for the cross sectional area.
 
manasi bandhaokar said:
for equilibrium of rod T = T-dT + dmω^2 x
dT = dm ω^2 x
integrating
T(x) =(d * a* ω^2 (x^2 - l^2))/2
this is negative of answer.where am i wrong?
I think the problem is associated with the minus sign in writing T - dT for the tension at the outer end of dx. The change in the function T(x) as you go from x to x + dx should be written as dT not - dT. The change in the function will be a negative quantity. So, the value of T at x+dx is T + dT where dT is a negative quantity.

By writing the tension at x + dx as T - dT, your symbol dT does not represent the change in the function T(x), it's the negative of the change in T(x).
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
I think the problem is associated with the minus sign in writing T - dT for the tension at the outer end of dx. The change in the function T(x) as you go from x to x + dx should be written as dT not - dT. The change in the function will be a negative quantity. So, the value of T at x+dx is T + dT where dT is a negative quantity.

By writing the tension at x + dx as T - dT, your symbol dT does not represent the change in the function T(x), it's the negative of the change in T(x).
oh!
thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top