How Old Is the Rock Using Potassium-Argon Dating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Number1Ballar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Rock
AI Thread Summary
Potassium-argon dating is utilized to determine the age of solidified lava flows, relying on the decay of the potassium isotope 40K into argon 40Ar. The half-life of 40K is 1.28 billion years, and the ratio of 40Ar to 40K is critical for calculating the rock's age. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the application of the given 40Ar/40K ratio of 0.12 in the dating equation. Participants emphasize the need to correctly identify the variables in the decay equation, particularly distinguishing between the parent and daughter isotopes. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between the ratios is essential for solving the problem accurately.
Number1Ballar
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The technique known as potassium-argon dating is used to date old lava flows. The potassium isotope 40K has a 1.28 billion year half-life and is naturally present at very low levels. 40K decays by beta emission into 40Ar. Argon is a gas, and there is no argon in flowing lava because the gas escapes. Once the lava solidifies, any argon produced in the decay of 40K is trapped inside and cannot escape. A geologist brings you a piece of solidified lava in which you find the 40Ar/40K ratio to be 0.12. What is the age of the rock?


Homework Equations


N=N0(1/2)t/t[1/2]

where N is the number of nuclei, N0 is the initial number of nuclei, t is time allowed to decay and t[1/2] is the half life.

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually do not know where to start with this one. I'm not sure how to apply the ratio given, and what variable I am even looking for, or if I'm even supposed to look at the relevant equation.

Could someone please point me in the right direction?

Thanks in advanced!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation can be rewritten as

N/N0=(1/2)t/t[1/2]

Can you see a link between the ratio N/N0 and the Ar/K ratio given in the question?
 
yes I think I see the connection..

0.12 = (1/2)t/1.28billion??

solving for t? I don't get the right answer though

ln(.12) = t/1.25billion(ln.5) is what I was trying..
 
You'll need to be careful about the value you use for the N/N0 ratio. N is the number of undecayed parent nuclei, not the daughter nuclei formed from the radioactive decay.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top