Finding the charge density,when Electric field intensity is given.

Nero26
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Given, E=ar20/r2 (mV/m) in free space,find ρv at the point (3,-4,1)(cm).
where, ρv=Electric charge density per unit volume
E=Electric field intensity

Homework Equations



∇.(εE)=ρv

The Attempt at a Solution



ε∇.E= -2\frac{20ε}{r^3}
for point (3,-4,1)(cm) r=\sqrt{26}x10-2 m
∴ρv=-2.67nC/m3

But the answer given was -1.42nC/m3

I'm trying to know whether the approach was correct or not. I couldn't figure out any reason for the problem.

Thanks for your help.

PS:The problem is adapted from "Fundamentals of Engineering Electromagnetics" by David K Cheng, pp90,Ex-3.4,2nd Edition
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TSny said:

I still can't get it.Here, ar is the unit vector along radius of sphere. E is independent of θ and ø so their partial derivatives of E will be zero.
∴ ε∇.E=-\frac{40ε}{r^3},so where am I doing wrong?
Thank you for your response.
 
The expression you are using for the divergence in spherical coordinates is not correct. It is not just the radial derivative of the radial component. Did you check the links provided?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Orodruin said:
The expression you are using for the divergence in spherical coordinates is not correct. It is not just the radial derivative of the radial component. Did you check the links provided?

TSny said:

Thanks all, Now I've got it.I was wrong in interpreting the question, ar is meant for cylindrical coordinates and aR for spherical coordinates in my book.
 
Nero26 said:
Thanks all, Now I've got it.I was wrong in interpreting the question, ar is meant for cylindrical coordinates and aR for spherical coordinates in my book.

Good thing, because I was about to point out that there is no unique solution if ar
had been the unit vector in spherical.

For example,
ρv = qδ(x)δ(y)δ(z), with q = 20/k, k = 9e9 SI, then ρv(3,-4,1 cm.) = 0.

An infinite number of alternative ρv would also exist, all satisfying ρv(3,-4,1) = 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top