Finding the charge when three charges are in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To find the charge q1 that allows charge q2 to be in static equilibrium, the forces acting on q2 must be balanced. The relevant force equation is F = k(q1q2)/r², where r is the distance between the charges. The correct approach involves equating the forces between q2 and the other two charges, Q and q1. It is essential to set up two independent equations to solve for the unknowns, as both q1 and q2 are variables in this scenario. Properly analyzing the forces acting on q2 will lead to the solution for q1 without needing the specific value of q2.
johnsch3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
q1___________Q___________q2
10cm 10cm

In the figure above the charge in the middle is Q=-3.1nC. For what charge q1 will charge q2 be in static equilibrium?

Relevant equations
I think that F=kq1q2/r^2 is relevant



my attempt at a solution
Since the ions are in equilibrium I assumed that F=0. so F2onQ=F1onQ=0
thus kQq2/r^2=kQq1/r^2
so [(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9C)(q2)]/.1^2=[(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9C)(q1)]/.1^2

but I'm not quite sure where to go from here or if I'm even going in the right direction. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're close with setting the two forces equal, but they aren't quite the correct forces to use. You want q2 to be in equilibrium, which means the forces you're going to be dealing with are those that act on q2. So that will be the force between Q and q2 and between q1 and q2. If you set up the force equations for those two pairs and then equate them, you should be able to solve for q1.
 
okay, I re-set up the equations to look like
[(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9)(q2)]/.1^2=(9x10^9)(q1)(q2)/.2^2

And I know that I have to solve for q1, but I don't understand how I am supposed to do that without the value for q2. How do I solve for q2 or is there something I'm not seeing where I don't have to know it?
 
1) symbols man, they make things look so much prettier =]

2) whenever I have 2 unknowns I have to solve for, I always like to have 2 linearly independent equations. Makes things much easier, I've found.
 
Let me try to summarize what I think you've said so far, and maybe you'll see what's going on with this.

## F = K \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}## is a relevant equation.

The charges are in equilibrium so we can say ##\Sigma F = 0##

That being in mind ##\Sigma F_{\text{ net on Q!}} = K \frac{Qq_1}{r^2} + K \frac{Qq_2}{r^2}##

[See anything yet?]

Now for some questions. How many forces act on each charge?
Therefore, how many forces should you have in the summation for each charge?

I'm trying to drop some hints without giving it away :smile:

P.S.
Can someone msg me and let me know why putting color tags in the middle of an equation makes the itex crap it's pants? I want to highlight certain elements i.e. subscripts but I can't... WTF ITEX
 
Try drawing and labeling the forces on q2.

Then set up your equation based on those forces, charges and distances.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top