Finding the Density of a Planet using Time

AI Thread Summary
A satellite's orbital period of 2.52 hours is used to find the density of a planet, assuming uniform density and that the orbit radius equals the planet's radius. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency in calculations, particularly when using the gravitational constant G and the period T. Participants emphasize the need to convert hours to seconds to ensure proper unit alignment. The incorrect formulation of density is identified, leading to confusion over unit compatibility. Ultimately, the conversation stresses the necessity of maintaining consistent units throughout the problem-solving process.
lanzjohn
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite is in a circular orbit very close to the surface of a spherical planet. The period of the orbit is T = 2.52 hours.
What is density (mass/volume) of the planet? Assume that the planet has a uniform density.

Hint: "very close to the surface" means that Rorbit = Rplanet

Homework Equations



please look at image below

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/4624/34096608.png

Where did I go wrong. I feel like its my terrible algebra skillzz?

Thanks guys
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your units. What are the units of (4\pi T^2)/(4/3G)?
 
ohh I just have to change hours to seconds? Well that would make sense then my number won't be as big, which is a good sign. Okay thanks. ill try that orr maybe not..

Why would I have to change the units of G? T I understand.
 
Last edited:
Yes, you have to do that, but that is not what I was talking about. You have as an answer

\rho = \frac{4\pi T^2}{G 4/3}

Numbers such as 3, 4, and pi are unitless. So let's throw them away:

\rho \propto \frac{T^2}{G}

The left-hand side is supposed to be a density with units of mass / volume = mass / length3 = mass * length-3. To have a consistent result, the right-hand side must have the same units. The period T has units of time while the gravitational constant G has units of length3/(mass*time2). Thus T2/G has units of time2/(length3/(mass*time2)) or mass*time4*length-3. Those are not the units of density.

Your units are inconsistent. That always means your result is garbage. Always.
 
Ok bare with me here,

So are you saying that my

d=t^2/G is wrong? I understand now how the units don't match up. But where did I go wrong?
 
At your second step you have M T^2 = (something)

At the bottom of the first column you have M = (something) T^2
You can just divide both sides of the first equation by T^2 instead of whatever
it is you did
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top