Finding the Derivative of x(3-x^2)^-2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oscar Wilde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the derivative of the function x(3-x^2)-2, which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically differentiation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule and the product rule in the context of the derivative. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the use of the chain rule and mentions a partial solution that does not match the expected answer. Others suggest that the product rule is necessary in this case.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of differentiation rules. Some participants have provided guidance on the need to use both the product rule and the chain rule, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster seems to be grappling with the complexity of the problem, particularly in recognizing the need for multiple differentiation techniques. There is also a mention of a specific answer that does not align with the original poster's calculations.

Oscar Wilde
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am supposed to find the derivative of: x(3-x^2)^-2

Homework Equations



The chain rule

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I feel that I am good at using the chain rule but something tells me I can't use it here, because when I do, I only get about half of the answer.

But anyway, I multiplied x by -2 , which I multiplied by the group (3-x^2)^-3. Then I multiplied that term by the derivative of the first group, (3-x^2), and got: 4x^2 * (3-x^-2)^-3

however, the right answer is listed as: 4x^2 *(3-x^2)^-3 + (3-x^2)^-2

for some reason I don't think the chain rule applies to this problem? or perhaps I am doing it wrong... I would appreciate any help or explanation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the product rule ;-) (or quotient rule, if you prefer) It generates two terms, but you only found one of them.
 
Like diazona says, the product rule (combined with your chain rule) shall set you free! :smile:

If it was simply

f(x)=(3-x^2)^{-2}

then the chain rule would have sufficed.

However, you have two terms involving x that are multiplied with each other so you also need to incorporate the product rule (or quotient rule for this particular case, but I'd personally prefer the product rule).
 
Thank you very much guys! I see where I went wrong. I appreciate your help, thanks again :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K