Finding the Electric Field of a Parallel Plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
An electron is launched at a 45-degree angle with an initial speed of 5.0×10^6 m/s from the positive plate of a parallel-plate capacitor and lands 4.0 cm away. The attempt to find the electric field involved using kinematic equations and the relationship between force, mass, charge, and electric field. A key error identified was the incorrect calculation of time, initially using t=x/cos(45) instead of the correct t=x/(cos(45)*Vo). After correcting this mistake, the final formula for the electric field is E = (m * Vo^2)/(q * x). This discussion highlights the importance of proper dimensional analysis in physics calculations.
arileah
Messages
8
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



An electron is launched at a 45∘ angle and a speed of Vo = 5.0×10^6 m/s from the positive plate of the parallel-plate capacitor towards the negative plate. The electron lands 4.0 cm away.

Homework Equations



F = ma = qE

v = d/t

s = vt -(1/2)at^2

x = 0.04 m

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We can find t by using trigonometry:

t = x/(cos45)

yf - yi = 0 = Vo * sin(45) * t - (1/2)at^2

Vo*sin(45) = (1/2)at

using F = ma = qE,

a = qE/m

so,

Vo*sin(45) = t * qE/(2m)

and using t =x/cos(45)

Solving for E,

E = (2m * Vo * sin(45) * cos(45))/(qx)

but cos(45)*sin(45) = 1/2

Therefore,

E = (Vo * m)/(q*x)

At this point I plug in my constants:

Vo = 5*10^6 m/s
m = 9.11 * 10^-31
q = 1.6 * 10^-19
x = 0.04

However I am getting a wrong answer. Could anybody point out where it is I've gone wrong? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arileah said:
t = x/(cos45)
Seems strange. Doesn't have the same dimensions left and right ...:rolleyes:
 
I think your error is the equation t=x/cos(45). It needs a ## v_o ## in it.
 
Charles Link said:
I think your error is the equation t=x/cos(45). It needs a ## v_o ## in it.

Of course -_- . Thanks! Silly mistake.

For anyone else who wants to use this thread:

My mistake was writing t=x/cos(45) instead of t=x/(cos(45)*Vo)

The end formula would then be:

E = (m* Vo^2)/(q*x)
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and BvU
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top