Finding the equation of motion of a given Lagrangian

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
Why do you bother with the volume element? Just apply the E-L equation to the Lagrangian density an you will directly get the equation of motion.
 
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
 
failexam said:
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
Hi,

The least action principle leads to the Euler-Lagrange equations which are conditions to what is integrated over all space. So there is no need to do anything with the volume element, ##d^4x##.

The E-L equations are

##\frac{\partial {\cal{L}}}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial {\cal{ L}}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} = 0 ##
 
I understand that.

But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?
 
failexam said:
But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?

Yes, the equation of motion will take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates. But as nrqed said, you should first derive the Euler-Lagrange equation and then impose the spherical symmetry (actually this just means to replace the d'Alembert operator by a double derivative with respect to "r").
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top