Finding the Equilibrium Temperature

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



following on from my thread in the Nuclear physics subforum, I am trying to work out the equilibrium temperature of three isotopes (Neon) in a state of equilibrium established by thermal contact with a bath of neutrons at a temperature T.

Homework Equations



\frac{[20Ne][n]}{[21Ne]}=exp(\frac{B(21)}{kT})

\frac{[21Ne][n]}{[22Ne]}=exp(\frac{B(22)}{kT})

where for example,
B(21Ne)=[Mass(20Ne) + Mass(neutron) - Mass(21Ne)]c^{2}
square brackets [..] represent concentrations

This is the relavent data for Neon:

A Ab mass (amu)
20 90.92 19.9924
21 0.26 20.9939
22 8.82 21.9914

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the equations to find T gives:

T=\frac{B(21Ne)-B(22Ne)}{kln\frac{[20Ne][22Ne]}{[21Ne]^2}} (*)

Now, B(21Ne)-B(22Ne)
={[Mass(20Ne)+Mass(neutron)-Mass(21Ne)]}-{[Mass(21Ne)+Mass(neutron)-Mass(22Ne)]
=Mass(20Ne) + Mass(22Ne) - 2*Mass(21Ne)

which is NEGATIVE (for neon, as well as for other isotope triplets)!

Because the denominator of (*) is positive, the equilbrium temperature is NEGATIVE! Weisacker who calculated this temperature worked it out to be 2.9x10^9K. What am I doing wrong? (I work it out to be -4.6x10^9)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any data about the number of each izotopes. Maybe you used higher number for higher energy state?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top