Finding the Initial Rate of Gas Leakage from a Small Hole in a Cubic Container

  • Thread starter Thread starter vmedica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Leakage Rate
AI Thread Summary
To find the initial rate of gas leakage from a cubic container with a small hole, the relationship between pressure, density, and velocity is crucial. The formula p = ρc²/3 indicates that the velocity of gas molecules must be considered, particularly how many are directed toward the hole. The proposed leakage rate of av/3 assumes that one-third of the gas particles are moving toward the hole, but it lacks clarity on how the pressure difference affects this rate. A more detailed explanation of the equations and their application is needed to confirm the accuracy of the solution. Understanding the impact of pressure on gas flow is essential for determining the correct leakage rate.
vmedica
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cubic container with sidelength l has a small hole with cross sectional area a (a<<l). The gas has density ρ and pressure P. Find the initial rate of gas leakage given that the outside pressure is 0.


Homework Equations



The question mentions the formula p=ρc2/3 so I know I have to use this.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that 1/3 of the particles are moving in a direction towards the hole. Any molecule in a cylinder of base a and length c will leave the hole in one second so is the leakage rate av/3, and then I can substitute out c with the formula? Is this the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any molecule in a cylinder of base a and length c will leave the hole in one second
Not bad - but your result does not appear to take the pressure difference into account.

I'd have wanted to see that explicit - can you explain what your equations mean and how you are using them.
I suspect you have it right, but cannot tell exactly from what you've written down so far.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top