Finding the mass of a beam by static equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of a beam in static equilibrium, the problem involves balancing torques created by weights on either side of a support point. A 100-gram weight is placed on one end, while a 168-gram weight is positioned 6.4 centimeters from the support point, which is 30 centimeters from the left end of the beam. The total length of the beam is 98.3 centimeters, and the weight of the beam acts at its center. The approach involves setting the torques on both sides equal to each other and accounting for the mass distribution of the beam. The calculations provided indicate that the results deviate significantly from the expected mass, suggesting a need to reassess the torque equations or assumptions made in the calculations.
yssida
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is actually an experiment we did at class. A horizontal beam was loaded with 100 grams weight at the left end. This beam was supported (with my hands) at 30 centimeters from the left end until balance is restored by putting another weight (168 grams) on the other side, which was found out to be 6.4 centimeters from the point of support (POS) at the right side. I need to find the mass of the beam given this information.

I'll try my best to illustrate this with text

|---------X----------|-----------|

wt here POS other wt here
(100g) (168g)


Homework Equations



Torque left = Torque right; or that they will sum up to zero

T=r x F; but since weight is perpendicular then T=rF or T=rmg (since only the weight is acting on the beam); but then I need to account for the weight of the weight added and the mass of the beam itself so: T=r (mass of beam portion + mass of added obj) g

to find the mass of the beam portion, we assumed the mass was distributed evenly; hence mass beam portion = Mass beam total * r / total length

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to Torque left=Torque right --->

r left * (mass beam left + mass added left) g = r right * (mass beam right + mass added right) g

and removed g

then I substituted the mass beam (left/right) with total mass beam * r / total length

giving me

rleft (Mtotal rleft/Ltotal + madded left )=rright (Mtotal rright/Ltotal + madded right)


Is this the correct way to go about the problem? The answers I get are very far from the measured mass of the beam.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the length of the beam?
 
I forgot, sorry it's 98.3 cm.
 
Weight of the bar acts at the center of the beam. Now apply

Torque left = torque right and find m.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top