Finding the Resultant Force to Using Vector Components and Trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
To find the resultant force, resolve each vector into its x and y components. Add the x components to get Rx and the y components to get Ry. Use the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the magnitude of the resultant force with R = sqrt(Rx^2 + Ry^2). For direction, apply trigonometry using the formula tan(theta) = Ry/Rx. This method is essential when vectors are not collinear, as they cannot be simply added algebraically.
navarro714
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What type of equation would I use to find the resultant force?

Do I just add the vectors together? Or change them to X and Y variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could resolve each vector into x and y components, add the components and "unresolve" the 2 components back into a vector.
 
You can't just algebraically add them, since in general they have different directions. Split each vector into its x and y components, then add the x components together to get Rx, and add the y components together to get Ry, and use pythagorus to get the magnitude of the resultant force (R = sq. rt. of (Rx^2 + Ry^2)), and use trig to get the direction of the resultant force (Ry/Rx=tan theta.)
 
If they are collinear you can just add them, as long as you take sign into account. Otherwise, it is best to resolve them into x,y,and z components.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can't just algebraically add them, since in general they have different directions. Split each vector into its x and y components, then add the x components together to get Rx, and add the y components together to get Ry, and use pythagorus to get the magnitude of the resultant force (R = sq. rt. of (Rx^2 + Ry^2)), and use trig to get the direction of the resultant force (Ry/Rx=tan theta.)

Thank you! I've been looking through my textbook for an hour! I remeber my teacher telling me about that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top