Finding the rock's theoretical maximum height.

AI Thread Summary
A rock thrown vertically with an initial velocity of 0.75 m/s reaches a theoretical maximum height of approximately 2.81 cm, calculated using the energy conservation principle. The relevant equations are kinetic energy (KE) and gravitational potential energy (GPE), which can be equated to find height. The calculations confirmed that the height is low due to the relatively slow initial velocity. The formula h = v²/(2g) is recommended for similar problems in the future. The discussion emphasizes the importance of checking calculations to ensure they are reasonable.
Matthew117
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. So I have this one question which I thought was going to be pretty easy, but now I struggle with it. It says:
1. The question

A rock is thrown vertically up in the air with an initial velocity of 0.75ms-1. What would the rock's maximum theoretical height be?

I am currently in high school and usually there would be one more variable given to make solving easier. We also assume that there's no air resistance, just to make the calculations easier on our level.

Homework Equations


The equations I think are relevant to this problem are:
KE = 1/2mv2
GPE = mgh
3. The Attempt at a Solution

In order to solve this I decided to set the two equations equal to each other. The final KE is going to be equal to GPE if we assume that all energy is transferred (please correct me on that one if I'm wrong).

Assuming that acceleration due to gravity = 10ms-1

(0.75)2m = 10mh
(9/32)m = 10mh
9/32 = 10h
h = 0.02813m
h = 2.81cm

This height looks very little to me, and I'm 100% sure it's wrong. My teacher wrote that question himself, so maybe he forgot to add one of the variables (it's not the first time something like this happened).
My test is this upcoming Wednesday and this really stresses me out as I feel like the answer is obvious but I can't find it...

Any input would be appreciated! Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Matthew117, Welcome to Physics Forums.

You've done okay with the problem. You did forget to write the "1/2" on the kinetic energy in the first line of the derivation, but I see that you included it anyways in the "9/32" of the second line. Your result is correct.

This sort of problem you can do symbolically and end up with a handy formula that you can use on other occasions. So:
##\frac{1}{2} m v^2 = m g h##
##h = \frac{v^2}{2 g}##
 
  • Like
Likes Matthew117
The reason it doesn't go very high is because 0.75m/s isn't very fast. ... Just 1.7 miles an hour.
 
gneill said:
Hi Matthew117, Welcome to Physics Forums.

You've done okay with the problem. You did forget to write the "1/2" on the kinetic energy in the first line of the derivation, but I see that you included it anyways in the "9/32" of the second line. Your result is correct.

This sort of problem you can do symbolically and end up with a handy formula that you can use on other occasions. So:
##\frac{1}{2} m v^2 = m g h##
##h = \frac{v^2}{2 g}##
Thank you so so much! I was thinking about the possible answers and this seemed to be the only logical one (the other one I got was over 100 metres and I don't think anyone can throw rocks that high :P).
Oh yes I did forget to include the 0.5 when I was writing the post, sorry. I will take a note of the equation you wrote for me, thank you.
 
Matthew117 said:
Thank you so so much! I was thinking about the possible answers and this seemed to be the only logical one (the other one I got was over 100 metres and I don't think anyone can throw rocks that high :P).
Oh yes I did forget to include the 0.5 when I was writing the post, sorry. I will take a note of the equation you wrote for me, thank you.

It's good to be able to do a quick check of results to see whether they make sense. You throw something up at less than ##1ms^{-1}##; it takes less than ##0.1s## for gravity to stop it; it's average speed is half what it started with. So, less than ##0.5m s^{-1}## average for less than ##0.1s## means less than ##5cm## height.

That's also a neat way to remember the formula you were given:

##h = v_{average}t = (\frac{v}{2})(\frac{v}{g}) = \frac{v^2}{2g}##
 
  • Like
Likes Matthew117
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top