Finding the total vertical distance - transverse wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total vertical distance a colored dot moves in a transverse wave over 3.00 seconds, given an amplitude of 5.89 cm and a frequency of 5.00 Hz. The initial attempt incorrectly calculated displacement instead of total distance, leading to confusion. The correct approach involves recognizing that the dot completes several oscillations, thus covering a total vertical distance rather than returning to the starting point. The key takeaway is that total distance is the amplitude multiplied by the number of oscillations within the given time frame. Understanding this distinction between displacement and distance is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
PhysicsFriend
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the amplitude and frequency of the transverse wave in the figure are, respectively, 5.89 cm and 5.00 Hz. Find the total vertical distance (in cm) through which the colored dot moves in 3.00 s.

http://i45.tinypic.com/3007ihy.png

Homework Equations



y = A sin (2pi x f x t - (2pi x)/λ)
v=λf
v= x/t

The Attempt at a Solution



x=vt
λ=v/f

x/λ = vt/ (v/f) = t x f = 15

Plug in x/λ = 15
Plug in A = .0589m
Plug in f = 5 Hz
Plug in t = 3.00 seconds

Answer = 0m

However, the online system says it is incorrect. I have no other strategy besides this one? Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found the displacement. Which is zero, because in 3.00 seconds the dot makes a few COMPLETE oscillations and returns where it was. You need to find the distance, which is the length of the total path the dot has gone through.
 
OH
y = displacement and not distance! Got it.

Thanks so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top