Finding the Transfer Function of an RLC Circuit with Parallel Capacitance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the transfer function V_o(s)/V_i(s) for an RLC circuit with parallel capacitance. The initial attempt resulted in a transfer function where the degree of the numerator was incorrectly greater than that of the denominator. Participants suggest reviewing the circuit schematic, particularly the connections of the input voltage (Vi) and ground. Clarifications about the circuit configuration are provided to help the original poster derive the correct transfer function. The ultimate goal is to determine the impulse response based on the accurate transfer function.
sagar615
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When i tried to find V_o(s)/V_i(s), i got a transfer function in s domain as,
degree of denominator was greater than that of numerator.
please help me find the transfer function of the attached circuit. i eventually need to find the impulse response.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
sagar615 said:
When i tried to find V_o(s)/V_i(s), i got a transfer function in s domain as,
degree of denominator was greater than that of numerator.
please help me find the transfer function of the attached circuit. i eventually need to find the impulse response.

Welcome to the PF. What transfer function do you get? Show us what you got.

And why would it maybe be good if the denominator had a higher order than the numerator?
 
Thank you for such quick response. I am sorry. What i derived has degree of numerator greater than degree of denominator. the transfer function that i got is, please refer to the attachment and let me know if I'm doing something wrong. thanks
 

Attachments

  • Circuit_Analysis.jpg
    Circuit_Analysis.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 495
sagar615 said:
Thank you for such quick response. I am sorry. What i derived has degree of numerator greater than degree of denominator. the transfer function that i got is, please refer to the attachment and let me know if I'm doing something wrong. thanks

I'm not sure (the problem statement schematic is a bit unusual for me), but I think Vi should be at V- input, and the other side of the xtal is grounded (connected to V+ input). Vi is not being fed in through the xtal. Does that give you a better result?
 
Vi is connected through the RLC circuit parallel with C_p. Attached is the other equivalent of the circuit. I hope that gives a better idea of the circuit i am trying to analyze. The schematic diagram seems correct according to this attachment. I do not know whether it gives a better result. I have just been asked to find the impulse response. so i was trying to evaluate the transfer function first.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit2.jpg
    Circuit2.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 480
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top