Finding the Uncertainty Limit from a data set

MaroonR
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I've run into a little issue with physics homework. During a lab we recently had, we were required to measure the amount of time it took for a ball to drop from different heights (2m, 1.5m, etc) using a photogate. Now that I'm writing the lab report, I have to find the uncertainty limit in my measurement of time. Here's my problem: I have 16 data subsets. We tested 8 heights with two different masses, and each of those had 3 trials. I was told to use the standard deviation, but when I looked at my course syllabus it told me I needed to have at least 10 trials in order for the standard deviation to be accurate. So as for my question, is there another way to go about finding the uncertainty limit? Or, could I possibly be misusing the standard deviation when I use it for each subset (each height)?

Edit: My professor listed an appendix online that says I should be able to see the uncertainty from a graph. If I graph a time squared vs distance graph, how can I determine the error from that? I'll include my graph
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    4.7 KB · Views: 472
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To see the uncertainty from the graph, you could translate your graph (the line you draw), keeping the same slope, up and down until all your data points are inside those two lines. They then give you the uncertainty. However, this method doesn't have _any_ mathematical background; here it's usually only taught in schools since they don't teach statistics there.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top