Finding the voltage in a non- series/parallel circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJBladester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 5K views
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find VAB and the power supplied by the source.

circuit_problem.JPG


Homework Equations



[itex]\sum V=0[/itex] around a closed loop
[tex]V_x=\left (\frac{R_x}{R_T} \right )E[/tex]
[tex]I_x=\left (\frac{R_T}{R_x} \right )I[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



problem_5.jpg


I end up getting the correct equivalent resistance (40.64 Ω), source current (1.23 A), and source power (61.5 W). However, my result for VAB is .096 V but according to my circuit simulation software it should be 29.73 V. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you shorting out A and B? In the circuit you have shown, R4 is just dangling out there, not dissipating any power.
 
I haven't checked your attempt but did you notice that when calculating Vab you can:

1) ignore R1 (eg remove it because it's parallel with V1).
2) You can also short R4 because the current in R4 = 0

Redraw the circuit and you end up with a v. simple two resistor circuit with just R2 and R3 as a potential divider..

Vab = V1 * R3/(R2+R3)

= 50 * 220/(150+220)

= 29.73 V
 
No current flows through R4 so Vab is the same as the V across R3.
R2 and R3 form a potential divider
 
lewando said:
Why are you shorting out A and B? In the circuit you have shown, R4 is just dangling out there, not dissipating any power.

There was no reason for me to short A and B. It was my mistake. It appears that R4 is a red herring in this problem.

CWatters said:
...ignore R1 (eg remove it because it's parallel with V1)...

I think I have gotten to the solution. After thinking about what you both said, it was a much easier route than what I was attempting to do. The big aha moment was the realization that R4 was not contributing as it was "dangling" on the original circuit.

problem_5_revised.jpg
 
I would do it this way..

Apply KCL at the battery positive node..

Ibat + IR1+IR2 = 0
or
- Ibat = IR1+IR2

Note that with R4 open circuit then..
IR2=IR3=VR3/R3=29.73/220= 135mA

As R1 is in parallel with the 50V supply then..
IR1 = 50/47= 1.064A

Substitute these two values into the above

-Ibat = 1.064 + 0.135
= 1.199A call it -1.2A

Power = V * I
= 50 * -1.2
= -60W