Finding z^4 in Polar & Cartesian Forms

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
menco
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Express z=-1+4i in polar for then find z^4 converting to Cartesian form


Homework Equations


r = sqrt(x^2+y^2)
theta = y/x
z= r cos (theta) + i r sin (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


r= sqrt(-1^2+4^2)
= sqrt(17)

theta = tan a = 4/1
a = tan^-1 (4/1)
= 1.3258
pi-a = 1.8158 (to find the argument from the real axis)

in polar form = sqrt(17) cis 1.8158

Then to cartesian form

z^4 = r^4 cos 4(theta) + i r^4 sin 4(theta)
= (sqrt (17))^4 cos 4(1.8158) + i (sqrt(17))^4 sin 4(1.8158)
= 289 cos 7.2632 + i 289 sin 7.2632
z = 4sqrt(160.9760) + 4sqrt(240.0161) i
z = 3.5620 + 3.9360 i

Im not sure if this is correct but hopefully i am on the right track. I was not sure if I was converting to Cartesian form correctly or if i should introduce z^4 at the polar form so that z^4 = r^4 cis 4(theta)
 
on Phys.org
menco said:
z^4 = 289 cos 7.2632 + i 289 sin 7.2632
z = 4sqrt(160.9760) + 4sqrt(240.0161) i
z = 3.5620 + 3.9360 i

This is where you went wrong. You had found z4 correctly, but then in order to convert back to z
(which you shouldn't be doing anyway because the question asked you to convert z4 back into Cartesian form, not z)
you should have simply calculated [itex]289\cdot \cos(7.2632)[/itex] and [itex]289\cdot \sin(7.2632)[/itex]

Now something else you should work on is avoiding the decimal approximations. If you calculate what you have, you won't get the exact answer. For example, [itex]289\cdot \cos(7.2632)+i\cdot289\cdot\sin(7.2632)\approx 160.976+240.016i[/itex] but the exact answer to the problem is [tex]\left(-1+4i\right)^4=161+240i[/tex]

So let [itex]\alpha = \tan^{-1}(4)[/itex] therefore the argument is [itex]\pi-\alpha[/itex] and so we have

[tex]z=-1+4i=\sqrt{17}\left(\cos(\pi-\alpha)+i\sin(\pi-\alpha)\right)[/tex]

And we can simplify these cos and sin expressions, and after that, we can then find z4. Now, can you simplify the expressions [itex]\cos(\tan^{-1}\theta)[/itex] and [itex]\sin(\tan^{-1}\theta)[/itex] ? And also, what about expressing [itex]\cos(4x)[/itex] and [itex]\sin(4x)[/itex] in terms of [itex]\sin(x)[/itex] and [itex]\cos(x)[/itex]?
 
menco said:

a = tan^-1 (4/1)
= 1.3258
pi-a = 1.8158 (to find the argument from the real axis)


I think that the argument required for z (which according to convention is measured from the real axis in an anticlockwise manner) is just a = tan^-1(4/1) and not (∏ - a).
 
grzz said:
I think that the argument required for z (which according to convention is measured from the real axis in an anticlockwise manner) is just a = tan^-1(4/1) and not (∏ - a).

I am so sorry!

I did not notice the -1 in z!