First Law of Thermodynamics and Melting-Ice Scenario?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermodynamics of an ice cube melting on a kitchen counter, with a focus on defining the system as closed. The first law of thermodynamics is applied, where the change in internal energy (∆U) is influenced by heat transfer (Q) and work done (W). Participants clarify that while heat moves from the environment to the ice cube, the work done by gravity is minimal compared to heat transfer. The ice cube and the resulting water are identified as a closed system, meaning no mass enters or leaves. Understanding the closed system concept is crucial for accurately applying thermodynamic principles.
Ortanul
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In order to explain the change in energy of an ice cube removed from a refrigerator and placed on the kitchen counter, I consider it as a closed system (can exchange only energy but not matter).
For the first law of thermodynamics, ∆U = Q+W. I'm pretty sure that the sign of Q is positive due to the temperature difference that results in the energy transfer. What I'm not sure about is the work. In the process that ice melts, I figure there might be a increase in gravitational potential energy because its center of gravity descends, so should the sign of W be positive, too?
I'm also not sure about the nature of those three types of energy. I guess the nature of internal energy is the microscopic motion of the particles in the system, but what about the other two?
Any help would be appreciated!
 
Science news on Phys.org
As you are writing the question, to me, it seems not totally defined: what is the system?
For example, you are talking about an ice cube resting on a counter..., and the ice
melting. So, presumable you are considering the counter top, as part of the system, and likely
the air around the ice cube, etc... So, the question to me is ill defined..

Thermo dynamics deals with closed systems... Yours is not closed, so you need to try and understand what
a closed system is, as far as thermo goes..
 
ken schatten said:
As you are writing the question, to me, it seems not totally defined: what is the system?
For example, you are talking about an ice cube resting on a counter..., and the ice
melting. So, presumable you are considering the counter top, as part of the system, and likely
the air around the ice cube, etc... So, the question to me is ill defined..

Thermo dynamics deals with closed systems... Yours is not closed, so you need to try and understand what
a closed system is, as far as thermo goes..
Thanks for your reply!
And I'm still confused about the definition of closed system. May I consider the ice cube itself as a closed system while the counter and air as the surroundings?
 
As the ice cube melts, heat moves from the environment into the system and the internal energy of the water increases as it changes from ice to liquid. Work is done on water by the gravitational field of the Earth, but this is a small effect compared to the heat transfer.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu
Khashishi said:
As the ice cube melts, heat moves from the environment into the system and the internal energy of the water increases as it changes from ice to liquid. Work is done on water by the gravitational field of the Earth, but this is a small effect compared to the heat transfer.
Thank you!
And do you think the ice cube itself can be counted as a closed system?
 
Ortanul said:
Thank you!
And do you think the ice cube itself can be counted as a closed system?
Yes. Yes. Yes! The ice cube plus then any water that forms from it is your closed system. This system is very well defined.

A closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves.
 
  • Like
Likes Ortanul
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top